I have a couple of videos, "Weird Bird at WTC on 911" and "The missile that hit WTC 2 in Slow Motion" that are getting way more hits that they should be and they actually are considered to be disinformation. I don't have any problem with this, but because they are getting web traffic, I would like to direct some attention to the real evidence that matters, like melted steel and powderized concrete. Many people don't know that over 1500 cars were hauled away, many of them to the Fresh Kills dump and that many of the cars had melted engines, melted guns in the glove box etc. The evidence shows temperatures of over three thousand degrees were present in all of the buildings on 911.
Many people don't know that both towers were blown up from the top down. If you look at the videos you will see that the walls stood in place and did not fall down, while the debris was blown upward and outward, and if you look closely you will see that a lot of the debris was vaporized before it ever reached the ground. One look at the video about "The Spire" will show you that the top part of it vaporized and that parts of the upright columns were still standing along with sections of the walls.
There is only one thing that is consistant in all of the videos, and that is the fireballs in WTC1 and WTC 2. Those fireballs were over three hundred feet across and exhibited explosive activity, even after being blown upward and outward from the building. The same kind of explosive activity that was seen in Baghdad during "Shock & Awe" in 2003, in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and recently in Libya, to mention a few. This explosive is thermobaric in nature and has been used in Bunker Busters and JDAM missiles for many years. It just happens that thermobaric weapons utilize nanothermite and are very efficient for such things as melting military vehicles. Take a look at pictures along the road to Benghazi in Libya.
I have to say that I don't know exactly what happened on that terrible day, but I might be able to come up with a better probability than the NIST did in their 10,000 pages of material that is written with a whole page of disclaimers that explain none of it can be used in a court of law.
well that solves that it was a pidgeon closer to the camera... thanks
12ozNoob 4 weeks ago
@12ozNoob Yep, just a weird bird, or is there more to it?
wordgeezer 4 weeks ago