Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ron Paul On A Hypothetical Panama Canal Threat: "All-Out" War If Declared By Congress

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,052
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Nov 28, 2011

In a radio interview, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tx) explains his foreign policy in terms of an imminent threat to the United States, ala the takeover of the Panama Canal by hostile regimes.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • i like the idea of All out war or none. because we should only be fighting war if there is that much of a need for it

  • It is interesting to note on how many folks have no idea what the US Constitution holds in it.

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • America has been in wars since it was a free country from the British. Even before it was free we were in wars with the Indians. I think America needs to take a step back and start thinking of a war free America.

  • What a very coy and clever way to say "I would invade Panama to protect American economic interests."

    Interesting how his continued stance on Panama is downplayed by his lackeys, pretending him to be a "non-interventionist."

  • @N33DL3R Under the Torrijos-Carter Treaties, while Panama is primarily responsible for the canal's defense, the U.S. retains the permanent right to defend the canal from any threat that might interfere with its continued neutral service to ships of all nations.

  • It's a shame that Ron Paul wants us to be the hostile regime to take over the panama canal. What a warmonger.

  • Ron Paul 2012!

  • Spoken like a true doctor- cautious, calculating, always sure he has all the information. When it is time for action, he is precise, concise, efficient and has a justification for his actions.

  • Paul doesn't mention it but he knows it. In this hypothetical scenario, there would be a reason as to why the Canal would be shut down, and that reason would be because of U.S. intervention somewhere. The reality is America doesn't have to deal with war if it stays out of other countries' business, which is exactly what Paul would do.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more