Cenk Uygur Vs Peter Morici Over Where America Is Politically

04 March, 2011 MSNBC

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• cenk
• uygur
• peter
• morici
• interview
• msnbc
• politics
• political
• america
• professor
• government
• argument
• heated
• debate
• rant
• furious
• angry
• pwned
• owned
• liberal
• conservative

[KataVideo]

I loved it right at the end, morici tries to be a clever guy, and PROVES cenk's point for him. GO CENK! I think the little fellow has his bow tie on a little too tight.

[hal2017]

It doesn't matter what the people want, the politicians are only interested in what the corporations want.

By the People, For the People, what a joke!

[joelwhitson]

Oh I have a tv show. I am a news host. I am smart. Professor I am going to give you facts and correct you.

[joelwhitson]

So....Fox news is a blatantly obvious news organization and they kick everyone's ass consistently and people like Cenk Uygur are all upset about it. So either America is either center right or more in the middle than liberal. Either that or liberal America doesn't watch news. So be so he can continue to be loud and proud that he is either wrong as he is often. Or that that liberal majority out there he is claiming doesn't watch news.

[liberalssuck000]

Cenk Uygur is just a fat-ass meatball!!!! "The Young Turds" sucks Cenk!

[seanwue]

Guys who wear bow ties can't be trusted

[Niceshoeswtf]

Oh...well I mean if America is "Undisputedly Liberal" then...how did Boehner get elected and put in the position he is in? Just because they got elected doesn't mean anything...HAHA yeah good one Cenk. I think Cenk is mad because Democrats got their ass beat in the last election.

[woodenmajor]

if cenk is right then we are truly f#ked

[SouthParkBear]

So Cenk thinks the majority of the country is STUPID.

Can't argue with that.

[zatoichiicc]

Morici was totally owned. He made points that had limited basis in fact. He tried to talk down to Cenk and Cenk simply pointed out the weakness in Morici's statements.

Morici's condensending tone did not conceal his substantial lack of substance.

[csprague95205]

@miketent09 (continued) ...then there's not going to be any consumers with enough means to buy products and sustain the economy that keeps them rich in the first place. You're putting the cart before the horse assuming production will solve everything. Also, the U.S. was a leader in manufacturing post World War 2 (the 40s and 50s) because much of the rest of the developed world was in ruins and rebuilding.

[csprague95205]

@miketent09 The federal government about gets 25% of their tax revenues from the top 1%. Someone like you may think this is unfair, but it's not when you consider they hold about 42% of the total financial wealth in this country. Raising their taxes would make a significant impact on our budget "crisis." To answer your 2nd question: the economy is driven by consumers. If the top 1% don't contribute to an infrastructure that supports the other 99% of the population... (continued)