The God Conclusion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
545 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Oct 5, 2009

Natural sciences and diverse religions provide evidence for origins and many argue back and forth as to the value of that evidence and the spin attached to it. However, among the sciences, only mathematics provides solid undisputable proof. Please watch the whole video as it progresses the message.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (davemakesawave)

  • Cells were not he first forms of self-replicating life dave. Cells evolved from organic chain molecules whose formation is much simpler than a cell. The likelihood of these forming is quite reasonable given the billion or so years it took to do so. Stick to your bible quotes. You are out of your depth in the real world.

  • @snoberts Well pardon me for not being detailed enough. So where are the fossils of these self replicating organic chain molecules, and where are the transitional fossils and why does this not continue to happen every day of the year given that with the passing of time the likelihood of such a fantasy increases? Life only comes from life; all else is a theory, or more accurately, a fantasy; a delusion.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice video i learned something today....

  • Thanks for the video, I think every Christian is supposed to share the gospel because everyone can reach different persons. Maybe you can especially reach highly educated people who would otherwise hide behind pseudo-science to reject God. By the way, what´s the music you have in the background? I really like it, especially the drums.

  • @kaxitaksi Okay, so I see you think highly of Dawkins paperback and that you consider yourself intellectually superior by repeating his deceptions but it’s the same old meaningless condemnation that he throws up all the time.

    In fact he confuses religion which Jesus condemned frequently as evil, with relationship with God. The same God who Dr Francis Collins knows. Google Dr Francis Collins and see what he has to say about Dawkins too.

  • @davemakesawave You gotta be kiddin! Your imagenary friend has nothing to do with things like science and reason because it's a delusion and your claim is a contradiction. If there was logic and reason in religion there would'nt be any religion.

  • @kaxitaksi It is called the God Conclusion for sound scientific and logical reasons.

  • @snoberts Evolution does not deal with these matters unless that is, like Dawkins you believe in aliens and your lucky stars. This is why I don't do the Common sense vs Evolution debate; it is pointless as the two topics are not on the same page.

    The Bible does deal with origin and destiny and that is why the Bible is so important.

  • @snoberts the main point of this vid is that life has so far only ever come from God. As for your detailed exposition of the evolution of fairy dust, you lack one thing, evidence. Beyond this I am not particulary interseted in evolution; having done it alread, I am far more interested in our origin and destiny.

  • @juanmcl1 btw, please only reply once for each point, you have posted masses of comments all the same. perhaps it is because of the new YouTube format, it isn't very clear is it; I don't like it.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more