Becky Greenwald--Making History

Becky Greenwald speaks to the Iowa state Democratic convention on 6/28/08. Becky is running against Tom Latham (R IA-4. If she retires Bush's wingman, she will be the first woman from Iowa to go to Congress, making history.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Becky
• Greenwald
• Iowa
• Fourth
• District
• 2008
• election
• Tom
• Latham

[SusaninIowa]

OHMIGOD!!! Supreme Court judges!!!! That should be a hot issue against Latham.

Why don't you accept your loss, too late to do it gracefully, and go away?

[ia4legalimmigration]

like I said before, we are VERY fortunate to be facing Greenwald. She doesn't have a clue what she's doing and her campaign is filled with L-O-S-E-R-S.

[SusaninIowa]

OK, so "Latham troll" is the answer to my earlier question.

[ia4legalimmigration]

Meyers isn't a sore loser, he was screwed by the "leadership" in several key counties. Do your math, if those counties are taken out of the equation, Greenwald would end up with less that 30% of the vote. THE FIX WAS IN, JUST ASK DON RUBY!

[SusaninIowa]

So, are you a Latham troll, or just delusional?

Meyers lost the primary, getting only 13% of the vote. Greenwald got 51% of the vote. The next highest vote total went to Kurt Meyer, who is not a sore loser, and who called her before midnight to congratulate her.

District 4

Democratic primary

100% reporting

X 51% - Becky Greenwald

28% - Kurt Meyer

13% - William J. Meyers

8% - Kevin Miskell

[ia4legalimmigration]

Like I mentioned before, do your math and look at the counties in question. Remove them from your list and then see how it turns out.

[SusaninIowa]

No, you do the math. And when you do, add 51 and 28 and 8. That is the percentage of the vote that you did not get.

But wait! Some counties (unnamed)would enable Myers to soar from 13% of the vote to beat two rivals who got 79% between them.

Your comments are as unintelligible as your video.

[helgiedogg]

One outfit for all her public appearances. Cute.

[ia4legalimmigration]

Do you realize according to the Code of Judicial Conduct, a judge "should not... publicly endorse a candidate for public office" or "make a contribution to a political organization or candidate."

It is a VERY BIG DEAL. CAN'T wait for our ads to hit the airwaves with that one next month!

[ia4legalimmigration]

BTW, we are very fortunate to be facing Greenwald, who will be as much of a cakewalk as Paul Johnson was. She's alreay screwed up by taking money from Supreme Court Judges.....hmmmm.