and as far as people not agreeing with me? conservation of energy is not a matter of opinion, and if you bithered to look into why they put the fireproofing on structural steel you wouldn't be asking that question.ever built a house or dne any welding?why should you believe these govt. experts over anyone else, they are as much a bunch of liars as any jerk on the street corner, anything else you want to know?
Yes ,that is right, people are a bunch of asskisseres, look into what some "whistle blowers' have to deakl with, then look into some experiments on human pchycology that shows just that, why am I some kind of maverick? because not many people played me a "favorite" most of you women get your asses kissed starting from an early age, so I look at things objectively for what they are,
@fillyferz If office fires weren't hot enough to threaten the structures by weakening unfireproofed steel, then why do all such structures require fireproofing to be applied during construction?
Is anyone disputing that the fireproofing was both deficient in application, as well as most of it knocked off the affected floors by the plane's impact?:I think not.
Questioning the fire's stated effect on the steel has no logical basis unless one is grasping at straws.
@fillyferz A personality profile which holds that anyone who disagrees with you must be doing so because they lack your moral convictions and were bought off or are afraid of some ambiguous but terrible punishment by TPTB. And believes that if all the "unenlightened sheeple" just knew what you knew, they would certainly come around to holding your fringe views.
@fillyferz Okay sure, so 249,900 Engineers and architects with the professional experitise to spot the alleged deficiencies in that report don't speak up about one of the most tragic events in US history because they want their bosses to like them.
And YOU are a maverick without any such encumbrance upon you, why , please?
Cut the bullshyte. Why would their bosses not want the perpetrators head on a platter just as much as you or any of the "twoofers"?
fine ,potty mouth aside, ( potty mouth) ! ? ? what you're asking is for the vertical support to fail simultaneouslly, fall onto itself, without deviation, gaining momentum, and breaking at simular intervals, from an office fire, ( jet fuel was GONE baby), and , ya know , the worst part is I have to explain this to you idiots over and over, it doesn't sink in,
@batvette because they are a bunch of asskissers, anyone saying 911 inside job is aleinated, in studies people in general will "not get involved" in order to be accepted by superiors, it's human nature and there is TONS of examples showing just that
@fillyferz Save the pottymouth for prepubescent punks who are impressed by that, would you? If you think being abusive towards others will cause them to find your arguments convincing, you know less about humanity than it appears you know about physics. Please answer: If a static load is allowed to fall 3 meters, how much is the load as applied to a structure below multiplied when the mass of the previously static load impacts it?
and as far as people not agreeing with me? conservation of energy is not a matter of opinion, and if you bithered to look into why they put the fireproofing on structural steel you wouldn't be asking that question.ever built a house or dne any welding?why should you believe these govt. experts over anyone else, they are as much a bunch of liars as any jerk on the street corner, anything else you want to know?
fillyferz 1 week ago
Yes ,that is right, people are a bunch of asskisseres, look into what some "whistle blowers' have to deakl with, then look into some experiments on human pchycology that shows just that, why am I some kind of maverick? because not many people played me a "favorite" most of you women get your asses kissed starting from an early age, so I look at things objectively for what they are,
fillyferz 1 week ago
@fillyferz If office fires weren't hot enough to threaten the structures by weakening unfireproofed steel, then why do all such structures require fireproofing to be applied during construction?
Is anyone disputing that the fireproofing was both deficient in application, as well as most of it knocked off the affected floors by the plane's impact?:I think not.
Questioning the fire's stated effect on the steel has no logical basis unless one is grasping at straws.
batvette 1 week ago
@fillyferz A personality profile which holds that anyone who disagrees with you must be doing so because they lack your moral convictions and were bought off or are afraid of some ambiguous but terrible punishment by TPTB. And believes that if all the "unenlightened sheeple" just knew what you knew, they would certainly come around to holding your fringe views.
batvette 1 week ago
@fillyferz Okay sure, so 249,900 Engineers and architects with the professional experitise to spot the alleged deficiencies in that report don't speak up about one of the most tragic events in US history because they want their bosses to like them.
And YOU are a maverick without any such encumbrance upon you, why , please?
Cut the bullshyte. Why would their bosses not want the perpetrators head on a platter just as much as you or any of the "twoofers"?
Typical conspiracy theorist. (ctd)
batvette 1 week ago
@vladimirkovalski - Amen! Praise the true God Jehovah and his son Jesus our Lord, King of Kings
SSKYPILOT2011 1 week ago
fine ,potty mouth aside, ( potty mouth) ! ? ? what you're asking is for the vertical support to fail simultaneouslly, fall onto itself, without deviation, gaining momentum, and breaking at simular intervals, from an office fire, ( jet fuel was GONE baby), and , ya know , the worst part is I have to explain this to you idiots over and over, it doesn't sink in,
fillyferz 2 weeks ago
@batvette because they are a bunch of asskissers, anyone saying 911 inside job is aleinated, in studies people in general will "not get involved" in order to be accepted by superiors, it's human nature and there is TONS of examples showing just that
fillyferz 2 weeks ago
@fillyferz Why is it that over 99% of the 250,000 licensed architects and degreed civil engineers in America accept the NIST report's conclusion?
batvette 2 weeks ago
@fillyferz Save the pottymouth for prepubescent punks who are impressed by that, would you? If you think being abusive towards others will cause them to find your arguments convincing, you know less about humanity than it appears you know about physics. Please answer: If a static load is allowed to fall 3 meters, how much is the load as applied to a structure below multiplied when the mass of the previously static load impacts it?
batvette 2 weeks ago