Peter Sutcliffe police press conference on arrest

Extract showing footage from the police press conference on the arrest of Peter Sutcliffe taken from a BBC documentary made in 2005 at the police request to convince the public that John Humble was the hoaxer.
http://www.yorkshireripper.com/index.htm

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Peter Sutcliffe
• Yorkshire Ripper

[johncopey]

Why has nobody been convicted of the unsolved murder, of Joan Harrison, (Preston 1975).

Surely, the police would have forced a confession from Sutcliffe, or even Humble, (hoaxer) for closure, if there was any sort of conspiracy?

[noelogaraa]

after his arrest the Lancashire tecs came to visit Sutcliffe and took his blood group and teeth pattern and as a result of that they knew he didnt commit the Preston murder. They wouldnt wear his confession to their murder and the WY police were very miffed over that. You could call it police rivalry but they didnt know at that time that there would be endless controversy over it. Some cops are honest. Some are dishonest and resort to frame ups to solve important cases.

[sandletters39]

Ronald Gregory sold his story to the Mail on Sunday and made £40.000.

[noelogaraa]

I wrote to the Mail on Sunday after the second part of Gregory's lying memoirs and they cut it short after that. Part three was very short but the paper failed to enquire further into the stitch up of Sutcliffe, the copycat killer. Gregory was directly responsible for all the further murders committed by the real Ripper because of his lies. It was all about getting a solution and appeasing the public that they got the Ripper.

[sandletters39]

At least he had finally struck the guts to say that anyone seen with hookers in suspicious circumstances was to be brought in for questioning by the Ripper Squad and this was what happened when Sutcliffe had Skoda numberplates on his Rover and the false details he had already given with the weapons in his pocessions. Yet the police had already made a catalogue of mistakes in the inquiries and that can never be forgotten.

[noelogaraa]

not quite what happened. Sutcliffe was a copycat killer telling everyone that he was the Ripper. He had been eliminated 12 times already. In desperation he went to Sheffield because the WY cops knew he was a nutter and the Sheffield lads thought they had the Ripper when they saw the prostitute, false number plates hammers knives and his suspicious attitude. you need to view my website yorkshireripperdotcom

[Panthera0nca]

You'd kill your own Grandmother to sell that pathetic book of yours O'Gara. What was it that Jacqueline Hill's mother said about making profit from the Ripper case? Something about any money they receive being marked with blood from her daughter and the other victims.

[andrew1984uk]

So how come the real killer hasn't topped any more women since 1981?

[nufto]

the chief constable comes across as quite insensitive to the victims families

laughing as if he had just won the lotto.

wouldn't mind but none of those men sitting there were responsible for catching him but two on the beat cops who did their job.

[noelogara]

@noelogara to answer the other point, Tracey gave me the impression that he couldnt drive. It was very deliberate but I had no reason to think he might have been acting so that he had a witness to that effect if the police ever got on to him. This guy was no actor. He was a serious criminal who covered his ass at every corner. Nobody would have been happier to believe he was not the Ripper than myself. I couldnt find anything that would eliminate him, only more to incriminate him as time went on

[noelogara]

@300amazingfatboy300 Just as the Birmingham police knew that the 6 were not the real bombers, the WYP, Dick Holland who stitched up Kiszko and Oldfield who stitched up Judith Ward for murders, knew that Sutcliffe was the copycat killer and the deal was no trial and 10 years in the mental. Sutcliffe was a nutter who had hammers knives screwdrivers etc everywhere. He needed to be arrested to relieve the burden on him, perhaps some guilt but he was too far in.

[300amazingfatboy300]

@noelogara

Answer me this.

1. Sutcliffe was able to direct the police to weapons used to kill the 'Real Ripper's victims after the fact. How?

2. The Real Ripper, by your own admission, didn't even drive until 1978. So how can he have been the man seen with Emily Jackson, or the man who left tire tracks all over the Irene Richardson murder scene?

3. Does the Real Ripper actually exist?

[noelogara]

@300amazingfatboy300

Yes I know that its unbelievable but it happened. Dont believe me but believe the evidence. Sutcliffe was eliminated a dozen times. Police admit there are two killers involved. The Real Ripper is an unbelievable man. He is not an ordinary man. To take a hammer and plan to murder and mutilate one victim to taunt the police is incredible. He did it a dozen times. To write a few letters to the police was easy. To post them in Sunderland easy also. He fooled the cops as well.

[300amazingfatboy300]

Thanks for the quick reply and sorry about the delay. Now...

You're asking me to believe that not only did the WYP wait 25 years to frame up a randomly-selected man (who wrote to you professing his guilt, but also asking me to believe that the 'real' Ripper framed up a copycat who was conveniently on the loose at the same time as him.

Nah. Don't think so.

[noelogara]

@300amazingfatboy300 Yes I was ordered to pay as you stated but you fail to point out that due process did not pertain. Judge Timothy King refused me a jury which was my right and then he would not listen to my evidence as he conducted his kangaroo court in London. King refused to contemplate that I could be right and such a distinguished policeman could be a liar and scoundrel who framed John Humble as the ripper hoaxer. So he chose to support the policeman and he denied me an appeal also.

[300amazingfatboy300]

It should be pointed out (as Mr O'Gara will never point it out himself) that Mr O'Gara was, in 2008, ordered to pay out £50,000 in damages to WY's Chief Constable because there was no proof of his bizarre conspiracy theories other than, and I quote, "his own imagination".

Billy Tracey may not have sued for libel, but CC Gregg did, and they wiped the floor with Mr O'Gara. PEACE!

[isolationproblem]

I have heard about that poor Kiszko going down when Holland knew he was innocent Holland is now dead, and if he really knew Kiszko was innocent then he is evil