Controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7 Building

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,708
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 3, 2006

Evidence of controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7 building.

Looking at the upper right-hand corner of the building we see a rapid series of small explosions travelling upward just as the building itself begins to fall.

The size, placement and timing of these "puffs" is very consistent with squibs from cutting charges of the type used in professional controlled demolitions, and in fact nothing but small explosive charges could create such an appearance.

The decreasing volume of the building from the collapse itself could not create enough pressure to cause such localized high-velocity effects, and this early in the collapse would have only created a modest overpressure.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @arl5088 "the building came down by result of gravity!!!"

    Oh really? Last I checked, gravity causes symetrical objects with a-symmetrical damage to fall to the side of least resistance to gravity aka the damaged side.

    Last I checked gravity, nor office fires, nor jet fuel at MAX temps will not produce TONNES molten iron and steel which melts at thousands of degrees higher than jet fuel.

  • Damn patriot bush supporting AMERICANS LOL!! Bush and the US government would never do anything to hurt us they love us and all careLOL damn idiots, it's so obvious it was a inside job 9/11.

  • how the fuck was the building supposed to fall? so are you saying it should have done something different? that it shouldnt have come straight down? the building came down by result of gravity!!!

  • Has anyone been able to find a video of another building collapsing anything like WTC7 due to fire or war damage? Then we could shut the those conspiracy guys up!

  • did anyone ever consider the fact that the building was burning from the time WTC 2 collapsed to about 5:20. Nobody put the fires out or even tried to control them... So burning from 9-5 thats a lot of fire and having all the shit fall on it didn't work any wonders for its structural integrity.

  • Conspiracy theorist are priceless. You don't have to actually PROVE anything. Of coarse actors like Clooney and Rosie O'Donnell are know-it-alls so how could we doubt them?

    So did Bush bully the engineers who did the investigation as part of the cover up? Was he on the grassy knoll on November 22, 1963 too?

  • Fucktard. Honestly, stop jerking off over this shit. Why the fuck would anyone put charges on the top 5 floors? It would do nothing at all jerk off. If you want to debunk a conspiracy theory why were you still breastfeeding until you were 15, or haven't you stopped yet?

  • So, you're saying.. WTC7 was photo-shoped?

    And I'm a moron?

    Well, to each his own.

  • the building burned for 8 hours causing the steel to weaken and it just collapsed. no controlled demolition CRAP, get a grip!

  • Why isn't it in the official 9/11 report. Why did they deny that it was brought down? Why can't the former Mayor just answer the questions? If it's not a big deal and they did bring it down, then why did they do it?

    Conveniently the files of Georges pals under seige for coperate fraud were destroyed when this building got taken out. Open your eyes you dumb cunts!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more