Einstein Relativity theory declares aether necessary!

In science it is said that the einstein relativity theory proved that aether doesn't exist! This is totally false and has been supressed on purpose, to avoid people from thinking of free energy devices running on aether!
I hope this will give ideas to many as it should have happened decades ago!
Extract from: the race to Zero-point energy
As I keep seeing comments stating this is not Einstein voice, I added this in the description... Sure I know it is not his voice I never claimed it anywhere, I just posted this video to show a very important statement of einstein: 'to deny the ether is to assume that empty space has no physical qualities".
Space-time, ether... it's just a name... to those who have seen a rubber sheet describing blackholes in the spacetime continum (the hole bending the flat sheet)... What do you think space time is?? That sheet representing the flat universe we always see, what do you think it's made of?? Void again? or some kind of matter that has properties, ether, chi, prahna, space-time etc. it's just a name for the same...

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Einstein
• free-energy
• energy
• aether
• ether
• conspiracy
• truth
• hidden

[FujiSatori]

Very nicely executed! interesting concept. Check into Chukanov's Quantum Energy

[teslaandlyne]

Einstein never had a lab to test the aether. Tesla did and wrote about it. Tesla used powerful electrostatic radio waves and not weak EM that require powerful amplification radio receivers uping the volume in magnitudes. That is why Tesla wave went through and the Earth fine matter. Tesla ships even pull up plants to make crop circles. Build a big enough Tesla ship to pull the Earth along. Whatever gravity is Tesla make a more powerful force. He said so 1940 and died 1943 giving no word between.

[trevor123698123]

@TheMathKing I did not say that. Ever hear of "Vedic science"? Do they teach that in school? No. Ever hear Nikola Tesla's view of the physical? Probably not. Do they teach it? Certainly not.

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 You just said you rejected QM! You're all over the place! Go to school for god's sake.

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 Have fun with that mind of yours.

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 It seems that you don't know what you even believe in :), which is fine. You don't yet have the education to be able to know any better. You should seriously learn some basic physics before advocating these beliefs.

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 They have some ideas correct, then they just cherry pick the rest of their ideas, hoping that nobody would actually read their sources (because you need a university account to do so). They talk about how we don't account for the vacuum having substance, yet they fail to acknowledge GR's discussion of the cosmological constant. It even seems like you don't understand that paper either, it actually immensely supports general relativity! THey talk about schwarzchild solutions!

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 Also I read "The Rebuttal of North and Nieto", and ALL of it's sources. I must say that is one poorly written article (it's not even a journal or paper). It cherry picks like 3 legitimate papers from that era, and denies the entire context of the extracted information. It doesn't even have a clear purpose, it's all over the place. They say "he quantum interference without QM", then you read the paper and he just used semi-classical physics, which is entirely different.

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 He was awesome, and his opinion that physics was complete was shared by like 80% of the professors at the time. They all, however, admitted the issues with the invariance of the speed of light in maxwell's equations, and they all admitted the issues with the black body radiation, which required more powerful physics.

[TheMathKing]

@trevor123698123 They would know way more math than him. As for physics, anybody who studies physics now-a-days knows more than he does. Just like we know way more than Newton, since we now have Lagrangian\hamiltonian mechanics. There are more functional anlaysis (analysis in general), since his time too. Kelvin was a physicist way before the michelson and morray experiments. Way before we had satalites that need general relativistic corrections, or had confirmed black holes.