Fun with a 1943 Longbranch Sten MkII Sub-Machine gun

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
37,453
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 8, 2007

I installed a new bolt into my legal WW2 Longbranch made Sten MkII Sub-machine gun. Thats 32 rounds going out in that time frame there!

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Elkabong53708)

  • Are you running a modified bronze bolt with weight removed? If so any problems with the cocking handle striking the back of the reciever? Are you running a stronger spring or buffer?

  • @burner208 Its a Navy Bronze Bolt, thats not modified. I've had no problems with the cocking handling striking the receiver.

    Basic spring installed. Plus it kicked up the rate from 550 to 650 RPM.

  • My "Small Arms of the 20th Century" lists the cyclic rate of the Mark II at 550 RPM. That's about 9 rounds a second. I guess that's not carved in stone but I would have thought 2 seconds of shooting would not empty the magazine.

  • @busterpiggle Ah, but that also has the lighter navy bronze bolt, kicking up the rate by 100 RPM.

  • Longbranch is Canadian, isn't it?

  • @NormanMatchem Yes it is.

Top Comments

  • Finally someone know how to hold a Sten Mk.2

  • @11251309 Thats cause Hollywood shows everybody holding it by the magazine, which puts the magazine feed at a problem.

    Thank you for noticing.

see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • yeah that was fun....

  • What, some-one holding the Sten correctly!? that impossible.

    but no.. really. you might be the only one.

  • OMG a 2 second clip .... :-(

  • @MegaMrDamo Only if your firing from the hip, like when your rushing an enemy position. British troops were taught both methods but for any kind of accuracy you can't be holding the mag.

  • @Elkabong53708 not true british troops held it by the magazine, it can be

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more