Mitochondrial DNA

mitochondrial DNA

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• mtDNA
• DNA
• genetics

[Markusqwertyuiop]

SUCCESS!

EVOLUTION WINS!

[te1pasas2wey3]

wow you guys are funny. you guys have to learn to respect opeoples opinions everyone has the right to think what they want wether they belive something sdid creat us like GOD or not..okay

[ericajjful]

some sweet info here

[maxwellwilson4]

@sweetmikser sorry dude i forgot i had that email... to be honest, if a reputable source came out and said once in a while some paternal mtDNA does get incorporated into a zygote, it wouldn't turn my world upside down. it still wouldn't change the massive amount of replicated data that indicates how we inherit mtDNA. why are you so jazzed up about it? are you a religious fanatic? i am legitimately interested in how maternal inheritance threatens some people's worldview.

[sweetmikser]

@maxwellwilson4 (2nd), oh I see from your other comments a couple of months ago that you say you already saw my video. Apparently nothing sunk in, or you are doing what I said 2 months ago "fingers in ears, going lalalalalalala", because it disrupts this long-held paradigm, and messes up the Darwinist "clock". I'm wondering, though, why you chose to respond again 2 months later. But anyway, the data are there, despite Darwinist ignoring and/or suppression. Paradigms die hard.

[maxwellwilson4]

@sweetmikser (sigh). it's good to be skeptical, but it's laughable to just say that because you either don't understand or feel threatened bc everyone gets their mtDNA from mum. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of PCR if you claim that it proves mat inher is not true. I hardly think that it was a "paradigm" or "long-entrenched view" bc it would make sense to get our mtDNA from both parents just like our nDNA. But that's what is neat about research, sometimes you learn things.

[Ladylyla]

cool.. it kinda means we are more realted to our mothers tha our fathers :D

[sweetmikser]

@maxwellwilson4 (2nd) by the way,...be careful what you moronically call "established fact", as there have been many uh "established facts" throughout the decades and centuries that turned out to be established BS. In and out of the "scientific" community. For real, kid. Don't be a zombie your whole life. Always (and I'm saying this sincerely now) always...QUESTION THE ASSUMPTIONS. Don't dismiss problematic or contrary data and discoveries just because it MAY MESS UP THE DARWINIAN "CLOCK"...

[sweetmikser]

@maxwellwilson4 well if that's the case, then you're simply one of the drones my video describes, with fingers in the ears going "la la la la". It's very easy to idiotically dismiss things IF THEY DON'T FIT YOUR NEUROTIC PARADIGMS, PREJUDICES, AND LONG-ENTRENCHED VIEWS...as "inaccurate" and "arf arf not peer reviewed". The new data have been ignored. But PCR (which is more sensitive) and JM Smith revealed paternal swapping in a number of animals. Are you gonna tell that to your students? lol

[maxwellwilson4]

@sweetmikser I watched your video. Maternal inheritance is an established fact with mtDNA. What genetics background do you have? Your source you cited as "proof" that paternally transmitted mtDNA is real came from New Scientist, a NON-peer reviewed "journal" that has been highly criticized for the quality and accuracy of papers that are published, especially the one that you cited. I'll look forward to teaching my students about maternal inheritance tomorrow and mitochondrial disorders!