Logical history of humankind?

Has history been tampered with? The documented history of human civilization is supposed to reach several millennia back into the past. And yet if we consider the rate at which civilization is supposed to have progressed, we encounter periods of obscurity and informational vacuum following the alleged decline of every ancient empire, and then everything starts anew.CLICK ON AMAZON LINK!
Inventions are presumed lost for centuries, then re-invented by people whose names bear suspicious semblance to those of the ancient inventors. Just how true all of this is? Could history as we know it really be a collation of several chronicles relating to one and the same period of time?


Apparently, this is what the Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko claims. He is the author of the first volume in a series of seven that came out in English recently, and generated incredible controversy amongst professional historians worldwide. Many are trying to put the author into one league with numerous paranoid conspiracy theorists and mad inventors - however, all of his work conforms to the highest academic standards and is backed by solid scientific facts; furthermore, some of the most lucid minds of our time support many of the theories put forward by the authors. Garry Kasparov, the world chess champion, says the following in his preface to volume 1:

"Let us consider the factor of a mass character that I shall be referring to as psychophysical. Documented history tells us of the insatiable need of human beings to make discoveries. The vector of technological progress is a strictly vertical one. Every ten years something happens: discoveries, sea voyages, explosions... Everything keeps on changing, we see constant evolution - from Columbus to the landing on the Moon, from crossbows to nuclear bombs. Forwards and upwards. However, the traditional ancient history tells us of periods when humanity apparently remained dormant for centuries - "ancient" Egypt, the mediaeval "Dark Ages" - whole epochs of utter stasis in human thinking. It appears that the inhabitants of ancient Egypt and Rome had a different genetic code, and couldn't be bothered about anything at all, so they froze in their development, the result being a total lack of innovative activity. At the same time, there had been prosperous ancient empires where those among homo sapiens who possessed penchants for arts and sciences could get plenty of opportunities for growth and development. But, alas and alack, all of the prosperous "ancient" empires had ceased their development at some point."

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• dan
• brown
• mongols
• history
• channel
• today
• russian
• science
• tartars
• ancient
• historical
• research
• da
• vinci
• logic
• biblical

[bowtomonkey]

This is very good.

[BornAgainEngineer]

" 0_o " Aliens

[GhostWithSkin]

@Agustason i have, i just doubt alot of it for the same reasons you doubt what you doubt. the solution isn't that simple. nice theory though. the answer is the question. if you dont understand that, then i dont know what else to say

[Agustason]

@GhostWithSkin Check it out yourself.

[GhostWithSkin]

@celeste8801 seems like your hung up on race. you might be right about some of this, but then where did white people come from and if they were the rare color, wouldnt THEY be revered? maybe thats what gave white people ego's in the first place. now everyone has one. yay!

[GhostWithSkin]

@Agustason would you bet your soul to me that it is all 100% correct?

[Agustason]

Read the Urantia book for the truth.

[celeste8801]

PROOF!! Real proof is not shown in this fashion. This is scientific proof, meaning that it could have been made up. Like most things in this world. The truth is plain and clear this was at one point an AFRICAN world, then filtered out through genetic mutation and neglect. Africans were at one time seen as gods on earth. Everyone revered these Black Skinned people. Then cavedwellers saw the light and got some sense dominated by iliciting life as evil.

[joroma77]

I believe the Biblical timeline to the birth, death and resurrection of Christ, but after that history may have been tampered with. It's inconceivable that it took almost a thousand years for the Gospel to spread to the vikings. And the norse myths about Ragnarok correspond very well to the Flood. I believe the 1000 year reign of Christ might have been during the Christian kings of Britain. And that the population and knowledge growth is due to the 2nd resurrection of ancient souls.

[BlackmatterX]

You can bring the horse to the water but you cannot make him drink. Knowledge is power. Ignorance is a fatal bliss!