Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

CPAC: ATLAS SHRUGS introduces Mark Steyn

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,763
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 7, 2008

AtlasShrugs.com

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Based on what I've seen so far and based on seeing the weasels he is going against, I am still on his side, son. I'm glad he's making money doing what he is doing. BECAUSE HE DESERVES IT! You Marxists think that accusing someone of making money is an insult. I don't. It means that many people like you enough to GIVE you money.

  • If anyone saves Canada from turning into a land of subservient sheep who do what they are told and bend over backwards for every hysterical special interest group, it is Mark Steyn.

see all

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mark Steyn and Jack L. Granatstein are the two Canadians we should pay attention to.

  • OH???? Check again, numbnuts.

  • Israel is a war criminal. Obviously. Monsters

  • seems you are the embarrassment with all the thumbs down...lol,you are alone in your rhetoric lolol

  • Geller is a psycho...her posts are dribble. lolol

  • They are right which apply to ALL citizens. ALL the citizens is a group. ALL the citizens are collectively, the government by definition through their represenatives. STOP trying to rework the Constitution to fit your particular view. That is the job of the SCOTUS and since they have ordered the freeing of one of the ENRON CRIMINALS this week, I can say that the BUSH appointees were a HUGE mistake. BUSH was elected by ENRON. I know, I was there.

  • I agree that some even many of the Founding Father believed in universal (except slaves) gun ownership. However that DOES NOT in ANY WAY explain away the FACTS that the Founding Fathers were careful and learned men and decided NOT to word the Second Amendment the way YOU interpret it. What they DID decide to do was to protect the rights of a WELL-REGULATED MILITIA to own guns. THAT is PRECISELY what it say and PRECISELY what it means. NOW if you want ot AMEND that, then by all means go ahead.

  • Not at all. 19 and 26 simply guarantee the right to vote, which is definitely an individual right--indeed it is private to the individual and secret. The 23rd isn't even about rights, but about the special status of the District of Columbia.

  • Nonsense!

    "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton

    "No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."

    --Thomas Jefferson

    "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." --James Madison

    The 2nd amendment says that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." The meaning is clear.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more