Super Mario bros. review part 2 of 2 - by Shitcase Cinema

Shitcase Cinema's review of the Super Mario Brothers movie. In the review, John is transported to the 1990's and reviews the film. Part 2 of 2. Contains strong language. For (im)mature viewers only

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• shitcase
• cinema
• super
• mario
• brothers
• review
• bros
• luigi

[Atripple]

How can you make a movie about a guy jumping around collecting mushrooms and travelling through pipes? That would be even stupider than this movie.

[shitcasecinema]

True, but it'd have been good for a laugh.

[Entropy161]

...I've been saying for years that this (And just about every other Movie based on a Video Game) should've either been animated or not made at all.

I mean, looking AT the actual Super Mario Bros. games, what person in their right mind would ever THINK 'Wow, we should make a live-action version of Super Mario Bros.?'

That kind of borderline retarded and laughably deluded thinking is one (Of many) things that is wrong with this 'movie (If it can even be considered that)...'

[shitcasecinema]

Good points there. You never know, an animated movie might be made in the future.

[slashmaster28]

I kinda hope the stuff about you hating Luigi is a joke. I personally love Luigi. He's like the underdog, the Usopp of the Mario series. (You have to watch One Piece to understand, stay away from the 4kids dub) Anyway, this review had all the stuff I liked, it bashed a movie that deserved it and it was funny. Great job.

[shitcasecinema]

Luigi is cool, we don't actually hate the character of him :) Thanks for your comments!

[SnipermarcusEXE]

but i like luigi :(

[Entropy161]

@silenceofthehills ...Of course what I'm saying is opinionated, as the point of commenting on Youtube videos is to espouse opinions. You can't possibly be this stupid...But then again, you're sitting here trying to predict how a movie that was made 18 years ago would be if it was animated, while comparing it to some Theme Park ride. Therefore, I stand by what I said about your incoherent rambling, and you're dismissed.

'Wah...boo hoo' indeed, Mr. long-winded, incoherent rubbish.

[Entropy161]

@silenceofthehills ...You obviously don't get what I 'said the whole time,' otherwise, you would've admitted to your mistake and stopped replying to me several comments ago. Also, outside of this video page, you know nothing about me, especially my emotional reaction(s) (If any) to font on a computer screen. In other words, I'm not 'annoyed' or 'angered' by anything you're saying--I just find your incessant attempts to save face rather hilarious and pathetic, something I can readily tell.

[silenceofthehills]

@Entropy161

Well, what your saying is opinionated, as there is no difference. I can bring up comics and how people thought its art would never see light as live action. Fantasy = Animation...no. I'm I being incoherent for giving you AN EXAMPLE why its not perfect fact.

Anything else is not going to be in the film anyhow, as its not the story nor important. Still, I never stated that you had to change your opinion.

I'm stopping now, as its now just a bunch of combacks. Wah...boo hoo.

[silenceofthehills]

@Entropy161

I get it what you said all the whole time. If that then, how can my more recent comments be non-cohesive when I know what you mean? Look, it doesn't matter anymore. I sensed your annoyance or anger and I never cared for bickering.

The only angry man here is you, and I can tell.

[Entropy161]

@silenceofthehills (Continued) The only reason I said the movie should've been animated is because, as we all are aware, there are many things in relation to the Mario series that would've been better conveyed in animated form rather than live-action, something your obvious enjoyment at seeing your own font on the screen can't deny.

Game Over.

[Entropy161]

@silenceofthehills 'Uh,' no matter how many times you state that you weren't originally talking to me, the tact remains that: 1) I originally stated that IF a Mario movie just had to be made, it would've made more sense to have it be animated than live-action, and 2)You didn't shut up. In other words, your incoherent rambling was utterly unnecessary.

DO YOU FINALLY GET IT?

DO YOU FINALLY GET IT.

[silenceofthehills]

@Entropy161

Uh, no. My comment was not to you, however, what you said about it needing to be animated in not scientifically viable. Therefore, my statements ARE cohesive in letting you understand that it makes no sense as to why it needs to be animated. Say that, and your saying that Where the Wild Things Are HAS to be animated in spirit.

DO YOU FINALLY GET IT...

I didn't talk about a curse also, I was simply talking about the Pirates movie in which everything came from a simple ride.