SPL Sea vs sAviOr 2009-04-27 @ Heartbreak Ridge
Top Comments
All Comments (32)
-
savior looks tiredd
-
I wasn't arguing that the map wasn't Terran favored, rather that 90% is an unrealistic statistic given the games already played on this map.
This game Savior played did not prove Zerg can't win on this map because Savior did make mistakes. In addition the games already played on this map pretty much makes it impossible for a 90% statistic.
-
Ground armies have a horrible time moving and finding eachother across the map, this makes it perfect for tank lines slowly pushing forward.
Also, the 12 and 6 o'clock expos are absurdly close to the ramp, which zergs can't wall from. Other than the 2 naturals (one of which is actually easier for your opponent to get to) zergs don't really have any possible easy expos like they do on Katrina or Medusa, and since it's really expensive to build 3 sunken lines balance leans way towards terrans.
-
massive army at the end
-
I know, All these people are claiming map imba, Zerg just cant play here like they can on a map like gods garden where they get 3 free gas.
Its a relatively new map guys, just wait a while before you claim imba. its not like this map is Neo Requim TvP.
-
more like the rest of the field has caught up
-
Savior's management was pretty mediocre this game...nothing compared to how he was in his prime, and even compared to earlier this year.
Destroyer mode has expired. ):
-
It's Sea...[shield] is his practice clan.
-
Whatever the stats say, Savior was terrible. Comeon Savior!!!
It's 5-3 in favor of Terran including this game, but don't think it's going to get in the 90ish%...
Terran would need to win 22 more games without losing in order for it to get in 90% range. Please don't overreact because it's Savior.
BlackMagister 2 years ago 4
this is indeed heartbreak for me
stoneheart92 2 years ago 3