9/11 Not A Conspiracy
Top Comments
All Comments (1,373)
-
@JusticeLover110 the go ahead right now and debunk them, debunk the death of barry jennings and why the CIA won't investigate. debunk the smoke coming from the basement of the towers. debunk why building 7 fell, ill do it for you. according to larry silverstien, the 2 small fires, were going to "take down the building" so he said to "pull it" and it collapsed from demolition, in the same fashion of the twins. so explain, why bombs in 7 but not the twins?
-
@GreggyFreshh Ive already watched Loose Change. And all there are just the same bullcrap that has been spread by Alex Jones. I even watched a debate between Loose Change and Popular Mechanics and all of Loose Changes theories were debunked very simple.
-
@JusticeLover110 you want better answers watch loose change, zeitgeist, and soo many more. but what i first want you to do, is search up operation north woods, and the gulf of tonkin incident, and explain it to me.
-
@GreggyFreshh No I'm not. I'm just pointing them out as simple as possible because this is not somthing easily explined on a video comment section.
If you want proper answers got Popular Mechanics debunking 9/11 myths website. You will get much better answers there.
-
im not saying 9/11 was an inside job 100%, but why can't you and the government answer questions? or better yet, keep a straight story.
-
@JusticeLover110 you answer less and less questions every time. and your really trying to tell me right now, that the fire and jet fuel went down every single story? the building was hit on the 80th or something. it should have not fell at the speed of GRAVITY!! theres 80 something floors under it, and 30 above, and your telling me that that 30 completely overpowered the 80?! to bring a building built for 5 plane hits??! and building 7 just fell? look again, ask silverstein. Get real dude
-
@GreggyFreshh Ive already explined it to you. The Towers fell because of the damage that was done by the planes, and the uncontrolled fires within them. They feel for 3 reasons.
Damaged steel, Intense heat and weight from above.
And building 7 fell because of the damage it received from the towers and uncontrolled burning. There were no bombs.
-
@JusticeLover110 and there were no bombs in the 2 towers? explain building 7, there were 2 small fires. and that took down the whole building? building 7 had FBI and CIA offices....
-
Then explain Barry Jennings? and why the CIA refuses to investigate? and are you kidding? soo many people claimed to have heard bombs, and there were few, small, hand held pieces at the scene, but not the near indestructible rolls royce engines the plane had, those were gone.and the jet fuel was at the top of the building, why smoke from basement, and how would the building fall at gravity speed, it had lower support..
-
@GreggyFreshh Also no witnesses who claimed they heard bombs dissappeared, that is a rumor spread by idiots like you to try and validate their theoires. And those people said they heard explosions, not bombs. Those expolsions came from the crashing plane and the collpsing towers.
There I explained it nice and simple. Of course I could explain it alot better. All your stuff about vanshing planes, buring jet fuel and explosions has been answerd. So just drop the outdated theoires.
holy fuck SHUT UP ITS NOT A DEMOLITION A FUCKING PLANE HIT IT YOU ARE FUCKING STTTTUUUUPPPIIIIDDDDDD
DUBSTEPDUB305 3 months ago 8
@WIKILeaksIT and people like you believe everything but the truth and live your life with your head up your ass.
JDPublicEnemyNo1 3 weeks ago 4