Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Luftwaffe´s BF110 "Destroyer" at Kursk (Aug 1943)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,204
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 23, 2008

WW2 combat footage. German Wartime Newsreel (Die Deutsche Wochenschau Nr. 675, 11-Aug-1943).

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I am not disputing you, I am just pointing out that the 110 was never designed as a "heavy fighter" as the Lightning was. Remember, the Lightning was designed as a fighter, but was incorporated in a multitude of roles. The difference between the 110 and the P-38 was the way the props rotated. The P-38's turned opposite each other making for a more stable platform. It is as a Lockheed engineer stated, " The P-38 is two super-charged engines, with a cockpit as an afterthought."

  • @jmac0414 - well you hear that a lot about German WWII planes, ill suited in roles not designed for. Yet Allied planes were used in non-planned roles and did an outstanding job of it -- P-38, Catalina, Mosquito, Beaufighter were all multi engine planes pressed into service on multiple roles, in particular the P-38 as fighter, escort, light bomber, dive bomber, long distance bomber, high altitude reconnaissance, night fighter and interceptor.

  • Look at the name of the 110, "Zestorer" (Destroyer). This aircraft was designed for bomber interceptions, not as a "heavy fighter". It was unfortunate that, like some of the other aircraft in the Luftwaffe arsenal, the 110 was used in roles that it was never designed for.

  • The 110 was designed to seek out the enemy aircraft over their (enemy) homeland hence the long range and also the name destroyer.Because of its long range it was initially used in the Battle of Britain to plug the poor endurance of the 109. However it got stuffed when met with single engined fighters.It was used in Russia as it had a better chance of survival, well initially. Where this aircraft came into its own was as a night fighter during the twilight battles over Germany with the RAF.

  • @CaptainQueue Fat Goering was actually a preponent enthusiast of the Me-110 early in the war over the Me-109.

    If not for Goering and Milch, Luftwaffe would have ruled the skies during the entire war.

  • The "Destroyer" was actually a poor design and could not come anywhere near the performance of other 2 engine fighters of the time, the P-38 or British Mosquito. Goehring himself reportedly said the waste of attention on the Destroyer instead of real solutions probably cost them the air war.

  • big fucking deal, the krauts still lost the tank battle at kursk

    so this flyboy bullshit is gay

  • @1987jkilla

    Yes. But I am also referring to the brilliance Henschel displayed in advanced aircraft- built in modular sections of surplus materials, by semi-skilled skilled workers- to be flown by partially trained pilots- "der Salamander"

  • @purbanegoro u mean the He-162? it was a Heinkel, not a Henschel.

  • it is a messerschmit made by him the tide was turned by russian blood and british stubborness us money comes fourth after her troops.stalingrad was were hitler lost the initiative

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more