John Hutchison UFO Levitation

A toy UFO is being yanked around on a string. Notice the string on the upper left part of the screen. This demonstration of the "Hutchison Effect" was done for a television show. After being caught in blatant fakery, Hutchison initially claimed the string was a high-voltage wire. Later he actually admitted the fakery, and claimed he did it because he was under so much pressure to reproduce his "Effect", and had been unable to do so.

Hutchison is a complete phony.

Please see

http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/03/judy-wood-falls-on-her-sword.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Hutchison
• Effect

[DipAndChip]

YOU IDIOTS! Why don't you go look up more info on Hutchison before you call him fake! This was NEVER on of his experiments! The only video tapes he had of it were released and look nothing like this. Even the quality is way too good compared to his videos. So stfu and gtfo you dumb shits. Conclusion: The uploader is an idiot.

[CollinAlexander]

John Hutchison is a fraud. I've offered him $100,000 to reproduce his "effect" and he won't, he can't.

[jackkkkkkkkkkkkkable]

you can see the wire at the top left hand of the screen rofl

[BurgundyNews]

@CollinAlexander

He didn't accept your offer because it's fake. Nobody who would actually pay the 100k for the test would make such a ridiculous offer. You obviously have no idea how any of his experiments actually work. His la was seized and destroyed by the Canadian government. It would cost half a million dollars to get the equipment he had IF he can find it used today. Watch "John Hutchison Technical Interview" on youtube.

PS. this video is a stupid fake; the man is an actual genius.

[pacific505]

coton wire in left op on the screen move this bebe plastic ufo, with this adoloscent experiment him put down his credit, now i beleve 99% experiments is fake

[curtsher11]

@CollinAlexander if you were so sure he was a fraud, you wouldn't put up fake video demonstrations to discredit him. You're clearly a shill.

[kurisu925]

@laviliterthefirst Well... The line appears to be tugged on when ever the object goes up. I am guessing there is a small pully up above the model and there is a person off to the side pulling on the string. Besides if the string was there to tether the model to the testing area it would be connected to the ground below it. How is it supposed to hold it in the testing area from above? Also why would the string neet to go so far outside of the testing area?

[laviliterthefirst]

cant ever tell if the string in the upper left corner is there to keep the toy from flying out of the testing area or if its being used to move the toy

[kurisu925]

@Luckzzz The "Free energy" that claims to be breaking the laws of physics is what we are talking about here. That is the kind that is fake and only promoted by con artists.

[kurisu925]

@Luckzzz Dumb ass... there is a difference between free in the sence that you don;t have to pay for it and free in the sence that you get more energy out than what goes in. Solar panels harvest energy from the sun. By the way ever noticed how the government never tries to "surpress" solar panels, hydroelectric dams, or wind power? Ever noticed how it is only the ones that claim to break the laws of physics get "surpressed"?

[Luckzzz]

@kurisu925 It's a pity you don't believe it. Do a simple search on google and you will see the truth :) Don't blame me on what I believe or not. Do your own search on google. It's easy and simple. You'll find. Even a solar roof is free energy and we don't need to pay the gov't.

[kurisu925]

@Luckzzz Honestly the only reason why you believe free energy is real is because you want it to be real. You do not question the things that you want to believe in and thus it would be impossible for you to see any flaws in them reguardless of just how flawed they are. You will cling to any notion weather it be sane or completely irrational so long as it supports the conclusion you want it to support.

[kurisu925]

@Luckzzz Actually sir I research fraud and study the people who commit it. John Hutchison, Russle anderson, John R.R. Searl, and Paul A. Laviolett are just a few names of well knowen con artists I have studied. Most of hutchison's evidence can be replicated with a few simple camera tricks, Russle Anderson does not even try to provide evidence, John Searl's own son claims the 60 year old photographic evidence he has is fake and Paul... the adress for his company is fake.