SUBARU STI VS. CELICA GTS

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
19,379
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 21, 2007

at Bandimere Speedway Denver, CO

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mongokid)

  • Not bad for a celica!!

  • yea it ant that bad for 6,000 ft above sea lvl in colorado.

see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 16.132 is very slow for a GTS...GTS stock is a 15 second car

  • @youtuPSP stupidest thing i've ever read.....

  • lol @ calling a base model (and likely automatic) impreza an STi

  • It's the natuaral Asperated engines that lose power at higher alts, not the turbos. In aircraft Turbos and super chargers where added to aid high altude flight. A turbo car is still out preforming NA.

  • @mongokid quit bitchin

  • u guys are as fast as those cars on the side!?

  • @bsmit389 LMFAO youre saying you get 13s with stock celica???? HAHAHA that has to go down in my record book. Okay, ill sell my 370z and get a celica

  • thats not an STI dumb fuck. STI wouldve man handled the celica tho the WRX already did

  • @GOVERNORknoc You sure are forcing air in but that different elevation has different density of air and that is why it needs to hit that dyno.

  • @danielperish handling is where its at. I am staying on the windy mountain path and smoking things.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more