Triple H Comes to Smackdown! 6/27/08

The Game has arrived on smackdown

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• 6/27/08
• xStPunkx
• smackdown

[asakapaquiao]

Good Ol' JR= GREATEST COMMENTATOR/ANNOUNCER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WWE

MICHAEL COLE= THE GREATEST CHEESE EATING COMMENTATOR/ANNOUNCER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WWE

[Ryderz651]

Triple H's first tenure on Smackdown... it was amazing

[thekidcuse2000]

So honestly, what were the thoughts on Triple H on Smackdown for the year? I personally thought it was cool yet at the same time, it seemed like he put most of the younger guys down, guys who aren't around anymore.

[Jeffzkrazie]

@Dgugil19 Whoa whoa whoa whoa man, whats with the extreme name calling man? If you can't keep the argument on a mature level then go back home and await for the puberty to kick in and then come at me with a more positive approach.

I've already made my argument clear and abundant that the PG rating is not killing the WWE. Maybe (and probably) your to young to remember watching WCW. But WCW was awesome! They were PG all the way up until 2000! So that include the years that the nWo was in function

[Jeffzkrazie]

@StooperStunner Lol how does it suck when I just proved that it isn't the rating man. It's the writers who suck and I have some great news on that subject.

I read a article yesterday on Wrestling Inc (who gets most of they're stuff from the Wrestling Observer Newsletter) that key members of the creative team are soon to be replaced. So your gripes and groans are going to come to a complete cease-fire in the near future my bro!

Heres a toast to better times ahead Stooper!

[StooperStunner]

@Jeffzkrazie PG still sucks, im tired of hearing john cena saying poopy jokes, to make the kiddies cheer for him, hopefully CM PUNK will launch into a new era.

[Jeffzkrazie]

@StooperStunner Dude not to damper on your parade man... But the PG Rating ain't hurting the WWE man. WCW was PG from 1996-1998 (the golden years of WCW) and they were also PG..

Don't blame the crapness of the WWE now days due to the PG-Rating because they can still show nudity (not full nudity) and curse if they'd like to.

[StooperStunner]

@Jeffzkrazie lol true.

[Jeffzkrazie]

@StooperStunner I'm not saying that 2007 didn't have good storylines. They had a few decent ones! Michaels/Cena... Batista/Undertaker... Bleh Orton and Cena had a good match at Sumerslam of that year I agree but bro! That feud swallowed! Lol! Now I did like Shawn Michaels/Randy Orton feud from the latter part of 2007, that was awesome. I mean Okay, you had The Great Gayli main event in three title matches on PPV in 2007. Well.. Nuff said then :D

[Jeffzkrazie]

@Dgugil19 Dude! The TV rating means absolute crapola! Maybe your not old enough to have watched WCW back in the day... But guess what man? WCW was PG during the ENTIRE nWo run (1996-1999) and they pulled off kick ass shows monday night after monday night!

The WWE doesn't suck because of they're PG-Rating... They suck because the writers have been sucking up bad air with these crap-hole story lines for to damn long!

[Dgugil19]

@Jeffzkrazie TNA is not PG thats what makes it all different.

[Jeffzkrazie]

@Dgugil19 What are you talking about man? I agree the TNA is putting some good stuff out in the last few months but TNA sucked dusty balls last year!!!!! Dude!!!!! This whole thing with CM Punk "leaving" the WWE is nothing but a story line. I still can't believe that some people think its legitimate !!!!!!!