Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Jodelle Ferland v.s. Dakota Fanning for the part of Jane Volturi of New Moon

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,367
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 8, 2009

who would you prefer Jodelle or Dakota for the part of Jane Volturi in the twilight sequel?I basically think that Dakota wouldn't be able to pull it off .(Jane being pure un-concentrated demented and evil and all that) I want to know what you think! comment or message plz rate and tell me whats up!!!
ningún copyright querido

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (blackcanary123)

  • there was a petition to be signed to get her the part but i guess its too late if they put Dakota in the movie it ruined 4 ever.

  • definately jodelle, its not fair that she didnt even have a chance, they just GAVE the spot to Dakota! that sucks!! not that i dont like Dakota...but Jodelle would have been a billion times better and she should haev had the chance to audition

  • I agree totally but did they really give Dakota the part???

  • So I heard. The director was so confident in Dakotas ability that he just offered her to role. I read it on a pole on some entertainment site. I really wish they would have let people compete for the spot, there might have been even better unknown actresses then Jodelle too, instead of adding Dakota whos career is far superior to all of the other actors in the movie combined! To put her big name in as a minor role is a bit of an insult to the other main characters in my opinion.

  • perfectly put thnx!

Top Comments

  • When I first read new moon, i always pictured Jane as Jodelle! i think she would be perfect! Dakota Fanning is a great actor, but i think jodelle is more talented and she seems more like jane...in a good way :)

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @blackcanary123 Yes they gaved her the part.

  • Dakota has this innocent and "good girl" look about her that you wouldn't expect her to be evil. It makes her even scarier than Jodelle who always plays the creepy kid; it makes it more subtle. But i'm still curious what it would have been like had they reversed roles, hmmm....

  • I like jodelle better she has that unique rare beauty she would like she's from the voulturie..dakota is good but joelle woulda been better..just my opinion

  • @rachsmithers What the fuck did you just say? Jodelle couldn't compare to Dakota!?!?! FUCK YOU! Jodelle is one million times better than Dakota! You should judge on ACTING, not who you like best, fuck face.

  • Jodelle would be perfect!! she would have a perfect role for her, but i love Dakota to DEATH!! so i cant pick!

  • Jodelle should have been Jane. Dakota is good, but she just never came across as creepy in the movie. Jodelle is pro at the creepy part.

  • who cares if jodelle didnt get the part??!! she played Bree!! and now she is going to get her own movie 4 The Short Second Life of Bree Tanner.and Dakota was great.

  • jodelle defo. wheni watch new moon and eclipseat the movies, in pretended that is was jodelle so yeah

  • Definantly Dakota! I mean, yes Jodelle does look more scary.. But Dakota is an great actress... She nailed the role as Jane!

  • Definantly Dakota! I mean, yes Jodelle does look scaries.. But Dakota is an great actress... She nailed the role as Jane!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more