Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Lyndon LaRouche International Emergency Presidential Address Part1.avi

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
966 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 14, 2011

(copy share)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eajrl4aul-s We often hear the claim that our nation is a democracy. That wasn't the vision of the founders. They saw democracy as another form of tyranny. If we've become a democracy, I guarantee you that the founders would be deeply disappointed by our betrayal of their vision. The founders intended, and laid out the ground rules, for our nation to be a republic. The word "democracy" appears nowhere in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution -- two most fundamental documents of our nation. Instead of a democracy, the Constitution's Article IV, Section 4, guarantees "to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." Moreover, let's ask ourselves: Does our pledge of allegiance to the flag say to "the democracy for which it stands," or does it say to "the republic for which it stands"? Or do we sing "The Battle Hymn of the Democracy" or "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"? So what's the difference between republican and democratic forms of government? John Adams captured the essence of the difference when he said, "You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe." Nothing in our Constitution suggests that government is a grantor of rights. Instead, government is a protector of rights. In recognition that it's Congress that poses the greatest threat to our liberties, the framers used negative phrases against Congress throughout the Constitution such as: shall not abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, and shall not be violated, nor be denied. In a republican form of government, there is rule of law. All citizens, including government officials, are accountable to the same laws. Government power is limited and decentralized through a system of checks and balances. Government intervenes in civil society to protect its citizens against force and fraud but does not intervene in the cases of peaceable, voluntary exchange. Contrast the framers' vision of a republic with that of a democracy. In a democracy, the majority rules either directly or through its elected representatives. As in a monarchy, the law is whatever the government determines it to be. Laws do not represent reason.They represent power. The restraint is upon the individual instead of government. Unlike that envisioned under a republican form of government, rights are seen as privileges and permissions that are granted by government and can be rescinded by government. How about a few quotations demonstrating the disdain our founders held for democracy? James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 10: In a pure democracy, "there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual." At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Edmund Randolph said, " ... that in tracing these evils to their origin every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy." John Adams said,"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Chief Justice John Marshall observed, "Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos." In a word or two, the founders knew that a democracy would lead to the same kind of tyranny the colonies suffered under King George III. The framers gave us a Constitution that is replete with undemocratic mechanisms. One that has come in for recent criticism and calls for its elimination is the Electoral College. In their wisdom, the framers gave us the Electoral College so that in presidential elections large, heavily populated states couldn't democratically run roughshod over small, sparsely populated states. Here's my question: Do Americans share the republican values laid out by our founders, and is it simply a matter of our being unschooled about the differences between a republic and a democracy? Or is it a matter of preference and we now want the kind of tyranny feared by the founders where Congress can do anything it can muster a majority vote to do? I fear it's the latter. Read more: Are we a republic or a democracy?
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/charters_downloads.html
http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrant...
http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/01/jp-morgan-funded-nypd-mass-arrests-over-700...
http://gulagbound.com/20252/how-serious-is-the-left-about-disrupting-america/
http://www.infowars.com/occupy-wall-street-protesters-call-totalitarian-gover...
http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/obama-wallstreet-electioncampaign/2011/07...

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (tatoott1009)

  • I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL!

    WE THE PEOPLE OF THE REPUBLIC ARE THE RESISTANCE TO NWO DEMOCRACY THE ANSWER TO NWO DEMOCRACY IS 177

Top Comments

  • I cant stand the anonymous mask in the background. This would have a better effect without it. I'm not kidding!!!

  • wtf happens to him at 11:30 ....

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ron Paul is the Only one in the cogress running for President that has neve NOT EVER voted for anything unconstitutional.He has a perfect voting record in his 13 yrs in congress he is the only one pointing out The Privately Owned federal Reserve as the ultimate culprits in the staged collapse of the financial system.He is the only one calling for small government and more freedoms for all.A vote for him is a vote for a return to the founding fathers vision for America.We Need You Now.

  • Like Ron Paul LaRouche is person with heart and mind, but too old to become leader now! Where are younger ones with such hearts and minds?

  • Although I have a natural tendancy to cringe at someone vying for power , the things that Lyndon LaRouche speaks of , has a certain aire of greatness of which I find compelling !

    I naturally suspect anyone who is willing to challenge the powers that be , either insane , or in danger of assassination , but LaRouche has the stature of greatness that over shadows my natural revulsion for anyone playing in that arena of power, and if there is any solution to our delema , he might be it !

  • So why do you super impose the Vendeta/Annon guy ?

  • Hate the beginning to these videos.

  • No more talking action is needed immediately. When is it going to be the right time when we are in WW3?

  • i thought that he was going to say Classified........!

  • @Ouijeannette Do it.! Do it.!...Bacardi cola Do it..!!!

  • Dude i love your work but will you please lose the Anonymous fade in, it`s just annoying!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more