The Holocaust hoax - a short video for Holocaust Believers.
THE N.A.F.H. CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE $54,000.00 REWARD For proving - just 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the magically disappearing mass grave claims: http://www.nafcash.com/
@mdmguyon O.K. I can agree - most (with notification that it's often hard to estimate how many people are there in the pile of ashes). But don't forget that witnesses testimonies are also considered as direct proof in trial. And funny thing - I was talking to my friend, and he told me, that human remains at Treblinka were found lately. I'm not familiarized yet with recent research, but maybe You will got Your "help". I have to check this, to provide more information.
@Florek112 I'd replace "some" (of your victims) with "most." It's a little hard to make an analogy between the dispute about the Holocaust and a murder trial. The defendant would have to be on trial only for killing a certain number of people in a certain way. Evidence of a number of deaths that didn't approach the number at issue and murder weapons other than the method at issue would be irrelevant. Ashes of most of the alleged victims at Treblinka or records of empty trains leaving would help.
Mars: That was an anaology based on your rather pathetic premise that to have an informed opinion on something, you must have direct experience of it. I suggest we keep these sideline issues.....in the sidelines. To briefly return to your ridiculous allusion, most historians are expert in history they were never part of or alive during. You really must try harder.
@mdmguyon This "Mars" theory looks more like: You're accused of murdering many people, of which some were found in Soviet Union in mass graves, burned remains of others were found in Poland, but we still can't find some of Your victims. Also We have many witnesses telling that they saw You killed them, including Your mates, and just few of Your friends telling that they saw nothing. Also we have few documents ponting You as a guilty one. How do You think - what would be the court judgement?
It might be more interesting still if the revisionists had an alternative and a destination where these people were routed to and why there are only 50 survivors who have come forward to indulge in the oft-claimed Jewish fascination for compensation and Holocaust celebrity.
You said no investigation turned anything up. Which investigations found nothing?
@timpovikings What was Mr. Hilberg's theory about where the ashes, bones, and teeth of the 870,000 victims of Treblinka were? It might have been interesting to go there with him and have him show me.
Where do I say I don't believe Butler? He is not cited - except by revisionists - as a source. That might be because he isn't one.
The primary source for the Hoess capture is actually the army staff who captured him, some of whom gave statements in a newspaper article you've never read, and Hoess himself.
There is no evidence he was fed false information and until you rise above the standards of a mildly interested amateur, you really have nothing but bullshit to work with.
@mdmguyon O.K. I can agree - most (with notification that it's often hard to estimate how many people are there in the pile of ashes). But don't forget that witnesses testimonies are also considered as direct proof in trial. And funny thing - I was talking to my friend, and he told me, that human remains at Treblinka were found lately. I'm not familiarized yet with recent research, but maybe You will got Your "help". I have to check this, to provide more information.
Florek112 9 hours ago
@Florek112 I'd replace "some" (of your victims) with "most." It's a little hard to make an analogy between the dispute about the Holocaust and a murder trial. The defendant would have to be on trial only for killing a certain number of people in a certain way. Evidence of a number of deaths that didn't approach the number at issue and murder weapons other than the method at issue would be irrelevant. Ashes of most of the alleged victims at Treblinka or records of empty trains leaving would help.
mdmguyon 19 hours ago
@mdmguyon
Mars: That was an anaology based on your rather pathetic premise that to have an informed opinion on something, you must have direct experience of it. I suggest we keep these sideline issues.....in the sidelines. To briefly return to your ridiculous allusion, most historians are expert in history they were never part of or alive during. You really must try harder.
Treblinka. Which investigations found nothing?
timpovikings 23 hours ago
@mdmguyon This "Mars" theory looks more like: You're accused of murdering many people, of which some were found in Soviet Union in mass graves, burned remains of others were found in Poland, but we still can't find some of Your victims. Also We have many witnesses telling that they saw You killed them, including Your mates, and just few of Your friends telling that they saw nothing. Also we have few documents ponting You as a guilty one. How do You think - what would be the court judgement?
Florek112 1 day ago
@timpovikings I'd hate to be convicted of murder based on the theory that the body of my victim was buried on Mars.
mdmguyon 1 day ago
@mdmguyon
It might be more interesting still if the revisionists had an alternative and a destination where these people were routed to and why there are only 50 survivors who have come forward to indulge in the oft-claimed Jewish fascination for compensation and Holocaust celebrity.
You said no investigation turned anything up. Which investigations found nothing?
timpovikings 1 day ago
@timpovikings What was Mr. Hilberg's theory about where the ashes, bones, and teeth of the 870,000 victims of Treblinka were? It might have been interesting to go there with him and have him show me.
mdmguyon 1 day ago
@mdmguyon
Where do I say I don't believe Butler? He is not cited - except by revisionists - as a source. That might be because he isn't one.
The primary source for the Hoess capture is actually the army staff who captured him, some of whom gave statements in a newspaper article you've never read, and Hoess himself.
There is no evidence he was fed false information and until you rise above the standards of a mildly interested amateur, you really have nothing but bullshit to work with.
timpovikings 2 days ago