NEW VIDEO OF WTC DEMOLITION
Uploader Comments (MikeyGonebad)
Top Comments
-
masses of charges going off, clearly visible
-
NOW THAT WE HAVE PROOF THAT SUPER-THERMITE PULVERIZED THE TWIN TOWERS, WHAT DO WE DO There is no doubt that Israel is using phosphorous bombs over Gaza. Israel is flagrantly violating the Fourth Geneva Convention," says Raji Sourani, head of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Gaza. "This is not the first time we have documented Israel using this kind of prohibited weapon against Gaza's civilian population," Sourani told IPS by phone from Gaza.
Video Responses
All Comments (58)
-
demolition by cia-qaeda plc!!
-
mushroom clouds^^
-
Here is beautiful, newly surfaced footage of the detonation charges exploding
your a fucken bawbag how the fuck is this beautiful, sick fuck
-
The idea that an airplane hits a building and that's what happens an hour later is preposterous. Absurd. Laughable. I can't believe people still believe it. I mean how dumb and brainwashed by action movies do you have to be?
-
The zoom and pans on this footage are done in post production. The camera doesn't change its position. Somebody took the footage and enlarged it and moved it around to fake the zoom and pans.
-
@tornadomad even a demolish building falls not faster than debris! But is allmost freefall, compare it to a building with CD! It's the same time for a 110 floor building!
-
@kixxclub Well, I have had my share of experience with explosives charges. What you see is : Paper, glass reflecting sunlight. Not explosions that would result in pressure waves with debris scattering either direction and possible smoke trails, especially if it was directional cutter charges. Having hundreds of cutter charges going of after the collapse would be the demolition misfire of the century. The towers were without a shred of doubt demolished, but wrong is wrong, right is right.
-
@ummGirlful i didnt know bush was muslim
-
@roxxphatcox you see paper cause thats what YOU wantto see, thats called cutter charges
-
now if people who see this video cant see the charges going off its not because they arent ther eits because they dont want to see them
2 Questions i have from this video and anyone please feel free to answer.
1: The title explains how it "imploded" yet the debris clearly falls away from the centre.
2: The discription suggests that it was a demolition yet we can clearly see that the core collums for 1/3 of the building remained intact for a while so it could not have been pulled down but mearly fell down.
rothschad 3 years ago
I could change the title and description to something of your liking .... but it won't change all the testimony of hundreds who heard, felt and saw exposions blowing out the central columns (ie lobby and basement level destruction) before any plane even struck the building, during the hour it stood after the plane hit and seconds right before the "collapse".
Your turn now....explain away the pyroclastic flow & fine powder without the prescence of explosives....we're all waiting.
MikeyGonebad 3 years ago 5
I am not convinced. First of all, the accusation that this was filmed in anticipation of an 'implosion' is without merit. Maybe they were filming because 2 planes hit buildings in there city hours earlier. The 'flashes of light' could be a number of things, so why suspect detonation charges? You can probably find a better way to spend your time, than to ride the conspiracy bus.
tdo79 3 years ago
I think the reason so many people suspect this to be a video of a controlled demolition is Gaileo's Law Of Falling Bodies -that mass doesn't fall into the path of most resistance at free-fall (and into a pile of fine dust)...at least with out explosives moving the mass out of the way. But enough of "casting pearls among swine"...if you wanna remain blind, it's your god given right.
MikeyGonebad 3 years ago