Al Qaeda doesn't exist [Full HD]
Top Comments
All Comments (26)
-
so to try to link Sophistication in this degree to middle east terrorism is like saying the average citizen can make an Atomic bomb, they haven't shown that level of skill, so why assert that they have it like they did on 9/11, and if US thought they did, why weren't they preparing for it and it's only being mentioned after the event not before. And what about the drills on 9/11 for a 9/11 type attack. I'm disappointed in the minds of those whom still beleive the "official" story clear cut.
-
And I just have to add, why do they keep saying "sophistication, sophistication, the attack is so sophisticated" as if it makes the claim look better, it doesn't. Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden are guerrilla fighters, Osama did work for the CIA before, but these guys do IED'S, makeshift explosives and hold ups etc, I'm not saying it's impossible, but they've NEVER shown such sophistication EVER.
-
To me, it would have been believable if just 1 building fell, 1 plane and they had evidence of the "terrorist" boarding the plane or such. But it was just too much, they went overboard, so you can spot the obvious inaccuracies, impossibilities and oddities. Not to mention the shady activities like Bush meeting Osama's brother, letting Osama's family leave the US when he's now an international threat, the "pull it" remark by Silverstein and his insurance change before the event etc etc.
-
Also with NO plane parts found with a hole in the ground way too small for a plane. I mean shall I go on? this is ridiculous, some of you don't know how much nonsense is stacked on top of nonsense to make the 9/11 official story work. The entire event sets waaaaay too many precedence, the probability alone should say "Wait a minute", not 1, not 2 but 3 Steel structures fall for the first time in history on the same day hours apart? really now. Not to mention burning for a very short time -_-"
-
Got no evidence of these said terrorist, first ever buildings fall from fire damage, into it's own footprint, molten metal found from just jet fuel, Hole on the pentagon not being big enough for a plane, no plane parts being found there, original pentagon hole being even smaller than the first one shown to us debunking the "wings folded in on impact" excuse, Building 7 falling from nothing at all but claimed to be fire damage as well (another steel structure) Another plane "Crashed"
-
American Airforce veterans made the comments that it would be hard for them to do what these so called terrorist have done with 100% accuracy. This is insane, they want us to beleive that 19 guys, (whom some are not dead today) walked through airport security (some were on the not so advanced watch list before 9/11 event), took box cutters vs a couple hundred passengers without a problem, crashed them into, not 1, not 2 but 3 targets (Twin Towers and Pentagon) with 100% accuracy-->
-
" " Why would that be the most likely suspects? How is that even logical to think when there is no evidence to point to them. Saying that would be illogical, there are terrorist in every country, and Oklahoma city bombing proved anyone could be a terrorist. This is also funny, because they think Osama and his "Al Qaeda" have enough talent to fly commercial planes into the World trade without a any error, when would they practice? How would they get aboard? why is there no evidence of this.
-
@cassius969 So what?dude, when you take that shit lightly everything goes...
-
The same as ETA in Spain, FARC and ELN in COlombia. NWO media control is everywhere.
lol I love how Americans are stupid enough to believe anything they hear on CNN or FOX. So the planes hit, melted the steel, and the building comes down perfectly straight. BS
GPLguitar 9 months ago 10
al qaeda is real he`s on the CIA payroll.
tucays1 10 months ago 10