"Giza Power Plant" Part 7 by Chris Dunn

Chris Dunn presentation in 2004 with his ideas and thoughts about Giza Pyramids purpose.

I highly recommend reading Chris latest book about technologies in Ancient Egypt - http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Technologies-Ancient-Egypt-Engineering/dp/15914310...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Giza Pyramids
• Power Plant
• Ancient Egypt
• Khemitian technology
• Giza Power Plant
• Chris Dunn

[smokeynewton]

@therealbabyrazor (continued from part 3) The pyramids were sealed with none of the trappings of an Egyptian burial. No Hieroglyphs, no treasures, and no bodies. So if they weren't tombs what were they? Who knows? If they don't tell us we can only guess. Christopher Dunn's theory is as good as any. We can guess what it is without knowing why. It may very well be a machine that we don't know how to operate because we don't think that way, maybe we can figure it out when we become more "advanced".

[braitnicho]

I think your looking into this way too much and take a step back and look again.

[Edubbplate]

@theonethatgoofs looks like a reflection from maybe a TV behind the computer screen

[richza123]

ive always belived since i was a small boy 1966 that earth was seeded by beingings from orions belt. and to make a long story short, giza powerplant was a means of transportimg ones' soul back to home world.?

[theonethatgoofs]

whats with the fox logo at 5.27

[smokeynewton]

@therealbabyrazor (continued from part 2) When we launch a rocket into outer space we do it with brute force to overcome gravity. There may be more graceful and easier ways to do it that we can't even conceive of because we don't think that way. It's the same with the pyramids....we don't think that way. The pyramids were not tombs, that's obvious. No mummy has ever been found in a pyramid and there's no evidence to support that they were EVER used for burials. (continued in part 4)

[smokeynewton]

@therealbabyrazor (continued from part 1) It may have been used for electroplating fake coins or jewelry but nothing has ever been found to support that. It may have been used to do "magic tricks". We will likely never know but the object remains what it is....an electric cell. You should not make the mistake of assuming that other civilizations would act and think like we do. Never assume that we are more "advanced" because we do things differently. We may be doing it the hard way. see part 3

[smokeynewton]

@therealbabyrazor I've notice that you posed this same question on nearly every part of this video, so I'm guessing you want someone to respond. You can guess the function of a "machine" without ever knowing what was in the minds of the people who built it. Take the so-called "Baghdad Battery" for example (actually a single cell, not a battery). It's obvious what it is because it's design is too purposeful to be anything else. We know 'what' it is but not 'why' it is. (continued in part 2)

[therealbabyrazor]

ok lets say all this is true. what did the use the power for? and..how much power does it produce? and..wouldn't an advanced civilization have a more efficient way to produce the same amount of power without having to build a mountain?

[glen58316]

my god he is 100% right this shit should be integrated into the text books in school.