TAO Universe Nassim Haramein and Marko Rodin 2of4

@ @ Nassim Haramein presents contemporary physics to explain the spin of electrons due to the black hole in all existence. There is no longer the Big Bang that leads to expansion and entropy. There are two forces only the electromagnetic and gravitational, as described in the Tao. Also at an informal meeting of physicists decipher the PHI spiral of sacred geometry and the universe of yin-yang TAO Marko Rodin.
@ @ @ Marko Rodin math tells us that decipher as the yin yang is the pendulum action of the reflection in a mirror that catches the trace of the finger of God. And his showing Rodin coil turn to the magnetism, taking into account the geometry and math lus perfect footprint or Étereodon god, Enneagram Rodin.
more in www.livestream.com/soundCOHERENCE

Category:

Education

Tags:

• universe
• tao
• iching
• Big bang
• black hole
• mathematics
• yinyang
• electromagnetism
• gravitation
• mirror

[mcnowski]

@JOE1986D considering english is not his first language, I think he does alright.

[JOE1986D]

A very interesting scientific explanation.. this is aaaaaa.. and aaaaaaa if you look in aaaaa and you can see that aaaaaa.. and aaaaaaa.. yeah... and I've discovered that if you drink from a glass of water it gets empty... How do you plot the word HOAX using MATLAB, mr nassim?

[timoboll777]

@worldphilosopher101 lol thats exactly what i thought...she made me horny, when I saw her legs and butt :D

[worldphilosopher101]

I like the part where we get to see Nassim's girlfriend.

[regulusofantimony]

@regulusofantimony oh shit i guess it is hard to respond when absolutely no logic was put into constructing this model. I'll give u some more time lolz.

[Megamans64]

It looks like a thumb print.

[Mannycom420]

drop below 10*..... -Ed leedskalnin

[regulusofantimony]

@JCRAM30 if it were as you say the electrons would not cross back through the event horizon i.e. they would disappear but not reappear. we would then be left with a binary b-hole pair and no electrons. btw can someone explain how we can detect quarks inside a nucleon, but according to this we should never be able to probe into a proton? Elements are determined by the number of protons inside the nucleus, how do you justify that with the binary b-hole model.

[JCRAM30]

@regulusofantimony they do, it's proven that they disappear and then re appear and scientist don't know where they disappear to. but the truth is when they disappear they go through the black hole.

[regulusofantimony]

@ghanz135 if i disagree with someone who is so blatantly misinformed, i am a troll? Why should i have to prove a proton does not have the mass of multiple celestial bodies? Very well then, if a proton has enough mass to be considered a black hole, then why do the electrons not spiral into the nucleus?

... aliens man