Snooker - Was that a foul or not? (Snooker Tournament 2009 - 27.04.09)
Top Comments
All Comments (416)
-
You're all correct.
Graeme was an idiot to block the white ball.
The ref should have told mark there was no ball in hand,
Although the ref never gave Selby ball in hand because the ball never left the tabel he did give ball in hand to graeme after mark selby slid the ball along the table not lifting it of the cloth.
Graeme should have just potted the white.
-
I would have just faked a miscue and potted the white.
-
Selby didn't lift the ball. Watch it carefully, the ball doesn't leave the table, he slides it along the cloth.
There's your reply!!
-
Stupid ref - he was always like that - absolutely twat ref as always with him
-
@lthewlis It DID.
Dott: You're saying Mark's fouled, but then you've lifted the white up
Referee: Because the ball has left the bed of the table when HE (Selby) lifted it
There's your answer.
-
im not actually sure selby picked up the ball instead of sliding it.. and even then its a pretty douchey move for dott to not foul back for selby
-
@Will137 or handball it...
-
Foul 4 to Mark Selby Foul Leave to Greame Dott....THAT WAS DISCUSTING !
The guy Selby & Dott talk to at 1:17 has been at every single session in the World Championship this year so far, in exactly the same seat. Now THAT'S dedication.
DevilboyScooby 10 months ago 9
Well, if i was Graham Dott - i would have put the white into one of the corner pockets, giving the shot back to Selby. There might be a small risk the Ref makes you concede the frame - but surely there is some common sense somewhere down the line...
Will137 9 months ago 7