Obama Birth Certificate Scam 2011-04-27 (mirror from youtube kdenninger)
Uploader Comments (LoneStar1776)
All Comments (41)
-
Not only is it fake, it was released 3 days before the death of Osama to take attention away from it.
-
This guy is wrong. Any pixels that Illustrator decides are "text" during optimization are put into a separate monochome layer. Take a look. Every single pixel is *exactly* the same color. Of course there is no "chromatic aberration" in a monochrome layer. Illustrator also adds a "white" layer behind the monochrome text to make it stand out. It's text detection is not perfect, so it leaves some text as originally scanned, notably the last "1" in the certificate number.
-
@LoneStar1776 OCR scanning software can and does in Illistrator
-
@Griffin47c Here's where the LOGIC comes in. If you scroll down two posts to Mr. Denninger's YouTube clip, he OBJECTIVELY PROVES that the Obama BC image is NOT a scan. Scanners CAN NOT generate full-saturation black text as is evident on the Obama file. This is not Mr. Denninger's opinion. This is not Ann Barnhardt's opinion. This is a fact, rooted in physics, namely Newtonian Optics. THEREFORE, any argument put forth by ANY person or group that is
You fucking fail lol. You can open any PDF file and view layers. Yes even when you scan it onto your computer. Lol
Griffin47c 10 months ago
@Griffin47c Here's where the LOGIC comes in. If you scroll down two posts to Mr. Denninger's YouTube clip, he OBJECTIVELY PROVES that the Obama BC image is NOT a scan. Scanners CAN NOT generate full-saturation black text as is evident on the Obama file. This is not Mr. Denninger's opinion. This is not Ann Barnhardt's opinion. This is a fact, rooted in physics, namely Newtonian Optics. THEREFORE, any argument put forth by ANY person or group that is
LoneStar1776 10 months ago
@LoneStar1776 is an argument built upon a FALSE PREMISE, and therefore the logical truth table beneath that argument utterly, totally and completely collapses. Put in its simplest terms:
The Obama BC file is not a scan.
Therefore, scanning software could not have generated the layers.
Q.E.D.
from barnhardt (dot) biz
LoneStar1776 10 months ago
@LoneStar1776 is an argument built upon a FALSE PREMISE, and therefore the logical truth table beneath that argument utterly, totally and completely collapses. Put in its simplest terms:
The Obama BC file is not a scan.
Therefore, scanning software could not have generated the layers.
Q.E.D.
from barnhardt(dot) biz
LoneStar1776 10 months ago
@LoneStar1776 You are wrong. Any pixels that Illustrator decides are "text" during optimization are put into a separate monochome layer. Take a look. Every single pixel is *exactly* the same color. Of course there is no "chromatic aberration" in a monochrome layer. Illustrator also adds a "white" layer behind the monochrome text to make it stand out. It's text detection is not perfect, so it leaves some text as originally scanned, notably the last "1" in the certificate number.
iamlost2 10 months ago
@iamlost2 That is not my personal assertion. I was relaying the argument of karl denninger. I am still trying to get to the bottom of all this.... Why didn't the Obama administration just scan the document as a single JPG? It's almost like they wanted to create confusion with layers, linked files, chromatic abberations,,,,, just scan the damn paper as a JPG, they made it crazy complicated when it didn't have to be.
LoneStar1776 10 months ago