DNA Haplogroup distribution in Turkey
Uploader Comments (orkunful)
Top Comments
-
Bizleri farslara calayirlar, sizleri yunanlara. Gunumuze baxin, gardaslar...
There are no pure nations in the world , all nations, icluding Greeks, Armenians, Russians, Italians , Chinese and others, are mixed. The determinant factors are the language and national identity.
-
Turks are the people of Anatolia who had lived in Anatolia for thousands of years. They are a people mixed, Persian/Greek/Arab/Armenian/Sy
rian/Roman and others. So big deal, the Ottomans came from Asia and converted them from Byzantines to Muslims. Either way, Turks are related to the Mediterranean stock. We should stop fighting!!!
Video Responses
All Comments (207)
-
The Turkic migration as defined in this article was the expansion of the Turkic peoples across most of Central Asia into Europe and the Middle East between the 6th and 11th centuries AD (the Early Middle Ages). Tribes less certainly identified as Turkic began their expansion centuries earlier as the predominant element of the Huns. Their prehistoric point of origin was the hypothetical Proto-Turkic region of the Far East including North China and Inner Mongolia.
-
@AVIATIO from where source you say the turk seen anatolia befor11 ADcentry(The Turk migration as defined in this article was the expansion of the Turk peoples across most of Central Asia into Europe & the Midle East between the 6th&11th centuries AD(Tribes less certainly identified as Turkic began their expansion centuries earlier as the predominant element of the Huns.Their prehistoric point of origin was the hypothetical Proto-Turkic region of the Far East including North China &inner mongolia
-
your video on Turkish haplogroups etc was informative... I'm pro-Turkey...(though I'm not a Turk). I'm also pro-Greek, pro-Italian, pro-Spain, pro-Bulgaria...etc. Anyway, bro, check out my video on Italian DNA... I think you might find it interesting. See the whole thing if you can. Cool stuff...and facts...and music, etc. Let me know what you think. It's at /watch?v=Z5SuE0s6BJI
-
@ruh1000 this is not true.Turkic khazars-todays name kipçak karaims are not jews or askenaizes.fact 1-karaimisim is a sect that only accepts old testament there are 50.000 in world -karaims accept 3 prophets,fact 3-a karaim must be any etnicity not semitic -in istanbul there are greek karaims for instance fact 4-kırım karays are 2000 people fact 5-they were not sent nazi kamps bec they are not semits in 1939 . fact 6-a karaim cannot get married to a Jew bec jews accept Talmud ,karaims dont
-
@orkunful Despite these results not being properly discussed in the Ashkenazim, it is clear that Turkic Khazars were a significant founding group of today's Ashkenazim men. The majority of Ashkenazim men are still from the Middle East with haplogroups J and E forming the majority. Nevertheless it is clear that there exists a significant Turkic contribution to the Ashkenazi Jewry.
-
@orkunful These haplogroups are non existent in Middle Eastern or Near Eastern populations. Haplogroup Q is shared by Siberians, Altaians and Native Americans whereas haplogroup R is predominant in Krgyz and other Turkic groups in Central Asia as well as being present in European populations. Haplogroup G is dominant in the Caucasus. These three lineages are mostly absent in Sephardic Jews. Q, R and G haplogroups together constitute a total of 33.8% of all the Ashkenazi Y-DNA
-
yeniçeri neymiş bi araştırın
Based on the data of the DNA genealogy, a concept was formulated and substantiated that in the ancient times, until the middle of the 1st millennium BC, two linguistic fields - the Türkic (Proto-Türkic) and Indo-European, the languages of the haplogroups R1b and R1a respectively, dominated in turns the whole Eurasia reaching the Atlantic Ocean. With a time difference of 1-2 thousand years,
ruh1000 11 months ago
There is no scientific evidence linking some languages to certain DNA haplogorups. This claim has no proven scientific backing.One of Pseudo-science fiction theories which is specialty of Turanist ideology.
Scientist and archeologist still do not know the answer but looks like Turanist fiction writers solved this problem too...
orkunful 11 months ago
@orkunful It naturally does not happen that both sides were so mistaken. This article attempts to show that both sides are correct, each on its own half. As states the famous saying attributed variously to A.Einstein or I. Newton, “The Nature is cunning, but not malicious.” And here the nature has played a cunning joke with the linguists. It seems that the two Caucasoid brotherly lines, R1a1 and R1b1, that came about 50-40 thousand years ago to the Eastern European Plain as a single branch
ruh1000 11 months ago
@ruh1000
If you want to talk about pure Turkic DNA haplogroup that probably linked to the Turkic language speakers. Evidence is stronger for DNA haplogroup N.
R1 haplogroups are rather sophisticated if you try to link a language branch. It would be more correct to link them to Slavic and Germanic languages but this is also hard to prove. Linguists and Archeologist still struggling to find correct answer.
R1 haplogrups are European and/or Slavic origin. Archeological and genetic evidences clear.
orkunful 11 months ago
@ruh1000
speaking a language does not determine your biological origin. Many African countries speak English or French...It does not make them British or French.
Language and cultural shift happens in front of our eyes even now. Anatolia was one of the first Christian lands and changed this identity in a very short time frame and became Muslim.
Did you know that between 1930 and 1960 about 3000 village names changed to Turkish? People forced to practice Islam and forbid do speak own language.
orkunful 11 months ago 2
@ruh1000
Slavic migartion to Central Asia during late glacial maximum is well known also archeologically. Central Asian population is slavic + mongoloid hybrid race. Mummies of fair-haired Caucasian people were found in the Tarim Basin, the oldest of which date back to 1800 BCE. The modern inhabitants of the Tarim Basin, belong both to this R1b-M73 subclade (about 20%) and to R1a1 (about 30%). R1a1 could be Indo-Iranian origin (approx. 2000 BCE), or nomadic Scytho-Iranian (after 700 BCE)
orkunful 11 months ago