Ziigmund overbets the river, Ivey faces a tough call.
Top Comments
All Comments (20)
-
Sahamies knew Ivey was waitin for flush and just doesnt waste time and moves it in, if phil has a slightly higher flush most likey would have called.
-
Perfectly played by Ilary, just unlucky the opponent wasn`t a fish, he was Phil Ivey.
-
big overbets are either bluffs or an attempt to appear like a bluff, and i always seem to guess wrong.
-
Considering the Dwan-Zig hand earlier, I would have made a bet of about the same amount made to Dwan. Shove meant either complete bluff or her had it. A lesser amount would have maybe payed off
-
it woulda been even better if the board paired for a chance of a full house
-
ivey played it ok. i think zig will have sets and J10 much much often than he has a fd so ivey called figuring he'd get paid off. zig's shove on river was stupid...even if ivey had nut flush..he knows he can only beat a bluff. zig's shove means bluff or full house...zig is not shoving river with flush (even nut flush) cause ivey could have J10 or 44 (middle set or top set and ivey will certainly reraise flop)
-
if ivey had smthg like king or ace high flush, he would have called
-
@personABOVEmeISaFAG it was a great overbet, he knew what ivey had. Only line that would of been slightly more profitable is CRAI.
-
missed a 100k value bet.... what I would do for 100k and this goof pisses it away....
-
if Ivey had an Ace flush he would call I think
Sorry is that Howard Lederer teaching Dwan how to play poker at the beginning of the video? He's criticizing Dwan for folding 7s full against Zig's 9's full... lol. That is perfect. LEDERER questioning DWAN for making one of the hardest lay downs possible (to be fair almost impossible when you're against Ziigmund)..
Basketbaka1031 1 year ago 10
would be more interesting to see if ivey would have called if he had the ace of clubs.
watergun7 1 year ago 3