IDF 2009: "Nehalem-EX, Addressing the Most Demanding Workloads"
Loading...
Loading...
3,038
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 1:45Macy's puts you in the Beauty Spotby channelintel168 views
- 45:39Intel Innovators - Round 2 Battlegroundby channelintel182 views
- 4:49Enabling Intel Smart Response Technology on Int...by channelintel753 views
- 2:28Intel Innovators Round 1 Winner - Cosmic Cartby channelintel173 views
- 5:16Intel Nehalem Core i7 Processor Introductionby hpidude11,103 views
- 3:00Oracle Performance Tipsby relianttechnology4,201 views
- 6:13IDF 2009 SF: New roadmap - to 22 nm and 15 nmby sai11711,694 views
- 8:22Intel core i7 940 (Nehalem)by R3APERvsTYETREE63,939 views
- 2:19IDF 2009 SF: Arrandale CPU/GPU Termal Designby sai1172,731 views
- 6:05Inside the Chips at IDF - Nehalem, System on a ...by channelintel16,671 views
- 0:43IDF 2009 SF: Menlow, Moorestown, Medfield - Pro...by sai117760 views
- 2:25Intel and IBM demonstrate 128-thread Nehalem-EX...by channelintel79,416 views
- 4:02IDF 2009: "Sean Maloney Keynote- Larrabee Execu...by channelintel66,058 views
- 2:14Data Center Container Warsby DataCenterVideos7,653 views
- 5:04IDF09 MID Sneak Peek Inside the Ultra Mobility ...by channelintel4,637 views
- 5:09IDF 2009: Paul Ottelini Keynote -- Talking Serversby channelintel1,349 views
- 3:04Making First 32nm Microprocessorby channelintel82,452 views
- 4:07IDF 2009: "What's Next? -- Westmere-EP Platform"by channelintel2,651 views
- 3:11VMWorld 2009: "Machine Check Architecture & Mem...by channelintel1,032 views
- 4:53Oracle OpenWorld 2009: Nehalem-EX Demo w/Machin...by channelintel1,833 views
@freebiemadguy123 Mac is not even COMPATIBLE witth those applications.
Also then why does Apple have a Mac OS Server edition.
The OS also isn't scalable enough.
For example those applications work best with tons of network adapters, and good hard disks.
Windows controls 70% of the data center business and character-based Linux controls 29%, with others taking the rest. Apple is so irrelevant.
Windows100000 1 year ago
@Windows100000 lol. just lol. Apple do not make such a product because it wouldn't fit in their product lineup - they don't make servers for crunching or folding. this is what these type of chips would be used for - I doubt an home consumer would use a PC with more than two sockets.
I'm also currently a windows man, but please explain to me how Mac OS 10.5 and above 'cannot handle' such applications? A technical explanation perhaps?
freebiemadguy123 1 year ago
@freebiemadguy123 I know what I'm talking about. Well my argument is concrete and that guy's argument against me is NOT.
Nehalem EX is not going to be in Mac Pros anytime soon and that's a FACT. It is TRUE that Apple's Macs never have more than 2 CPU chips in a single system while PC-OS-based servers have often 4 or more like I said. Macs also can never get 1 TB memory. Besides who listens to that pathetic market share of below 4%? Get real. Macs can't handle applications like SQL or RD server.
Windows100000 1 year ago
@Windows100000 I'd like to apologise on behalf of all windows fans. this guy clearly has no clue about what he's talking about and is spouting complete fanboy nonsense.
one again, sorry.
freebiemadguy123 1 year ago
Macs do not deserve Intel Nehalem-EX. Besides Apple's pathetic Mac OS can't handle such a huge workload and amount of resources.
Who ever saw a Mac Pro with more than 2 sockets when servers based on PC operating systems typically have 4+? Whoever saw a Mac with a TB of RAM?
Windows100000 2 years ago
time to buy that new mac pro
Omellykim 2 years ago 2
hai, can i be ur CEO pl0x?
ki11joy92 2 years ago
intel releases too many videos :P
TheRealNinjaGeek 2 years ago
More Please
miritkenny 2 years ago