2012 Charger SRT8 vs 2012 Challenger SRT8
Loading...
7,355
Loading...
Uploader Comments (808cuda)
see all
All Comments (18)
-
announcer said 13.38 not 14, and that makes more sense...you dont lose a whole 2 seconds at that altitude
-
The charger lost Becuase its not a 392 and the challenger is
-
so who won ?
-
@imserious2187 I think they look better than the previous year style. I think they need to make them 2 door to really mkae them better.
-
who won bro? what were their track times?
-
I just bought the new charger
-
new chargers look horrible
Loading...
The Charger was a 2012 392. I know because I personally drove it. I lost because my buddy cut a better light (I never ran Pro Tree ever before). Cars basically ran identical times.
808cuda 1 month ago
Both cars ran a 14.38 but my buddy cut a better light with the Challenger for the win. Keep in mind this is mid summer and high altitude mile high nationals. Also we had zero time behind the wheel, traction control on and the shifter in "D".
808cuda 3 months ago