V5K7J2
Uploader Comments (bannanaiscool)
Top Comments
-
you rock, i wish you were my teacher
-
damn.. your better than our teacher :P
All Comments (100)
-
Shouldn't be 7.7625 * 10^-11 mol of Zn instead of 7.7625 * 10^-13 mol of Zn?
-
If Avogadro's number is at 6.02 X10^23 why doesn't it change when you round it to 24...why is it one mole ? or is it more than a mole....
-
You are a great teacher! Much better than the one I have teaching me. Thank you so much for your videos, you have been of such great help! Keep making more videos! Thanks!
-
the enthusiasm and energy level with which you teach is really appreciable!!!
keep loading thes awesome wids....chemguy
-
I LOVE your energy, I learn so much more from you than my chem teacher..
-
ur going to be immortal !
-
@Panzer0127 maybe because they ARE crap? I know my teachers are.
IDK how they even got liscences to teach!!! XD
-
@ta1ntedxl0vee Same here XD
Thanks Chemguy!!!
is converting atoms and molecules the same?
328450J 1 year ago
@328450J Pretty much!
Chemguy
bannanaiscool 1 year ago
I am probably the only one in the world getting this wrong but I come up with 7.7625x10^33 :( where does the -13 come from?
Youcantbeseriousa123 2 years ago
You're punching it in backwards...Think about how 10^11 atoms of Zn would be far less than one mole of Zn (which would be 6.02x10^23 atoms, right?) Your answer says that there's more than a mole, not less. Try again and watch your exponents...
Chemguy
bannanaiscool 2 years ago
isn't Avogadro's Number exact... infinite... not used to determine significant figures.
cmreel 2 years ago
No. Absolutely not.
6.02 has 3 significant digits. This is absolutely correct.
Chemguy
bannanaiscool 2 years ago