Stonehenge Secret (Why stonehenge were built) (David Wilcock Theory)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,759
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 31, 2011

CLICK HERE- http://www.krschannel.com/whatif.html
The information in this video has been obtained from David Wilcock, not Andrew Wilcock as I misspoke in the video.
Stonehenge is a prehistoric monument located in the English county of Wiltshire, about 2.0 miles (3.2 km) west of Amesbury and 8 miles (13 km) north of Salisbury. One of the most famous sites in the world, Stonehenge is composed of a circular setting of large standing stones set within earthworks. It is at the centre of the most dense complex of Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments in England, including several hundred burial mounds.[1]

Archaeologists believe the iconic stone monument was constructed anywhere from 3000 BC to 2000 BC, as described in the chronology below. Radiocarbon dating in 2008 suggested that the first stones were erected in 2400--2200 BC,[2] whilst another theory suggests that bluestones may have been erected at the site as early as 3000 BC (see phase 1 below).

The surrounding circular earth bank and ditch, which constitute the earliest phase of the monument, have been dated to about 3100 BC. The site and its surroundings were added to the UNESCO's list of World Heritage Sites in 1986 in a co-listing with Avebury Henge monument. It is a national legally protected Scheduled Ancient Monument. Stonehenge is owned by the Crown and managed by English Heritage, while the surrounding land is owned by the National Trust.[3][4]

Archaeological evidence found by the Stonehenge Riverside Project in 2008 indicates that Stonehenge could possibly have served as a burial ground from its earliest beginnings.[5] The dating of cremated remains found on the site indicate that deposits contain human bone material from as early as 3000 BC, when the initial ditch and bank were first dug. Such deposits continued at Stonehenge for at least another 500 years.[6]

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (KRSchannel)

  • and you are professor who? would you mind providing citations, bibliography and references to your 'research' material?

  • @DevilKnightyo here is my reference, David Wilcock (cehck my title), thank god I am not a professor, otherwise the truth would be not be told as is...,

  • @KRSchannel The man was asking if you have any citations in a reputed scientific publication.

  • @SatyajeetGaur lol, if you think that scientific main stream community will show information like this in their 'published papers', then I guess you probably think NASA doesn't have the budget, that's why they can not go, or there is nothing on the moon. In that case, you are welcome disregard this video.

  • I suggest you watch "The Code" By Carl Munck He debunks and explains the mathematical significances between stone henge, the pyramids, and all moniliths, and megaliths that have been stratigically places on the world... Now im not doughting it has something to do with metaphisically energy, but understanding the mathematical "Coincidences" has play a huge part in shapping my conciousness on the way i think about these mysterious ancient sites.

  • @SaturnDanceRitual interesting, I'll try to find it on youtube.

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why dont we just learn magic instead.

  • Interesting. You did a fairly good job of summarizing the topics that David Wilcock covers. Beware, though, of extrapolating a broad generality from a small specific. Example: Saying everyone in ancient Egypt was a healer.

  • Onederfull video! I had no idea limestone had qaurtz in it, I've studied a ton of Wilcock but must have missed that one.

    Thanks for being awesome and sharing!

    For the sceptics just read the Source Field Investigations and shut the fuck up you arrogant fools.

  • @SatyajeetGaur well my question is what are these methods and how do they prove the passage of time? i can see how you can estimate how old a tree is, but how can you estimate how old bones are, or even stones? stones could have been here since the beginning of earth and just be shaped into the structures they are now. just saying science cant prove how long something has been in existence for. so how long have humans been in existence for? bible says around 6000, scientists say 100000?

  • @DjGoGo09 Quite on the contrary, a multitude of methods exist to estimate the age of the object in question.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more