The interviewee makes many claims and throws around labels ("anti-women," "anti-choice," etc.), but she does not back up her claims with any substance.
The bill in question does nothing to prohibit or curtail abortion, and this video presented no evidence to the contrary.
This video was a 2:41-long slippery-slope fallacy with lots of labelling and glittering generalities. It was propaganda.
Isn't it funny how pro-choicers have so little understanding and compassion for the LOSS a woman goes through when she loses her unborn child to violence.
Saying that the baby she saw on the sonogram was nothing more "than a piece of tissue" really undermines the horror of this crime.
This is a violation against her rights and the criminal should be accountable for depriving her of her fetus. A true pro-choicer would respect and protect the choices of all women.
Why in the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada's poster entitled "How To Think About The Fetus" Joyce Arthur states "the fetus becomes a person when the woman says it does" but yet you people continue to fight against this bill? In this case it is a woman who has chosen to birth her baby and her fetus was taken from her against her will.
Also, this bill is not a domestic violence bill so they shouldn't expect it to cover domestic violence issues.
I find it a little strange how we can fight to protect trees and yet when a mother has to bury her 8-month-old pre-born child the law tells her her child never existed. Making something a separate entity from a woman does not make that thing a "person" with personhood rights. It just says it exists.
All these radical feminists need to understand that they do not speak for all women. They can only speak for themselves. This bill excludes any action on the mother's part therefore abortion has nothing to do with bill C-484. A quick read of the bill will make that clear. It is only for when a crime is committed against the woman and a woman choosing to get an abortion is not a crime against her.
im on cam and bored
great vid e9
Grzegoorz76 3 years ago
You said it girl !
SabrinaSilverstien 3 years ago
great interview, she made lots of good points.
HeavenstoLucy 3 years ago
The interviewee makes many claims and throws around labels ("anti-women," "anti-choice," etc.), but she does not back up her claims with any substance.
The bill in question does nothing to prohibit or curtail abortion, and this video presented no evidence to the contrary.
This video was a 2:41-long slippery-slope fallacy with lots of labelling and glittering generalities. It was propaganda.
FukYoMomma 3 years ago
Isn't it funny how pro-choicers have so little understanding and compassion for the LOSS a woman goes through when she loses her unborn child to violence.
Saying that the baby she saw on the sonogram was nothing more "than a piece of tissue" really undermines the horror of this crime.
Marikafan 3 years ago
Lol, she says she holds the future generations. I have a question, honestly how many extreme feminists even have kids?
thunderflash82 3 years ago
This is a violation against her rights and the criminal should be accountable for depriving her of her fetus. A true pro-choicer would respect and protect the choices of all women.
ThusFar777 3 years ago
Now here's a question...
Why in the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada's poster entitled "How To Think About The Fetus" Joyce Arthur states "the fetus becomes a person when the woman says it does" but yet you people continue to fight against this bill? In this case it is a woman who has chosen to birth her baby and her fetus was taken from her against her will.
ThusFar777 3 years ago
Also, this bill is not a domestic violence bill so they shouldn't expect it to cover domestic violence issues.
I find it a little strange how we can fight to protect trees and yet when a mother has to bury her 8-month-old pre-born child the law tells her her child never existed. Making something a separate entity from a woman does not make that thing a "person" with personhood rights. It just says it exists.
ThusFar777 3 years ago
All these radical feminists need to understand that they do not speak for all women. They can only speak for themselves. This bill excludes any action on the mother's part therefore abortion has nothing to do with bill C-484. A quick read of the bill will make that clear. It is only for when a crime is committed against the woman and a woman choosing to get an abortion is not a crime against her.
ThusFar777 3 years ago