Counter Protesting the Israel Haters at the Hyatt Hotel

This lone Pro-Israel counter protester faced off against the Anti-Israel crowd.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• new
• york
• city
• nyc
• protest
• Glenn
• Beck
• hyatt
• hotel
• grand
• central
• station
• zionist
• organization
• of
• america
• zoa
• israel
• palestine
• terrorism
• jihad
• speech
• middle
• east

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel I clearly stated Palestinians in the West Bank and said distinguished between those in Israel proper. You are clearly not being honest to suggest that that are no Arabs in Israeli controlled territories in the West Bank, who are not treated equal under the law. Just read the many human rights reports that have been generated over the years. That's not even a serious comment.

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel Menachem Begin, not yet prime minister but a member of the Israeli cabinet, allowed that: "The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him."

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel General Mattityahu Peled, a member of Israel's general staff in 1967, opined that "the thesis according to which the danger of genocide weighed on us in June 1967, and that Israel struggled for its physical existence is only a bluff born and developed after the war."

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel A number of senior Israeli military and political figures have subsequently admitted that Israel was not faced with a genuine threat of attack, and instead, deliberately chose war. Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli army chief of staff during the war, later stated: "I do not believe that Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent into Sinai on May 14 would not have been enough to unleash an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it."

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an ARMED ATTACK occurs against a Member of the United Nations" Notice again the capitalized words, not "perceived attack". Now I will provide you with a few quotes to follow!

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel Which part of "Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict" don't you understand? Notice the word clearly stated OCCUPIED and not "DISPUTED". Read the 2004 ICJ opinion and again you will see that the territories are described as OCCUPIED! I believe the Palestinians would say the Jewish homeland is Europe, but I am just guessing...International law did not exist when the US annexed Mexican territory.

[nopecharliesnoangel]

@steute2011

The censuses prove there were few Palestinian Arabs during the Ottomans & British rule, most Arabs came from the surrounding areas for economic opportunities. The others were mostly Bedouin. About 40% of Israeli-Jews are of Arab ancestry. Ashkenazim, Mizrachi and Sephardim are genetically Semitic not European, laugh and prove all the recent studies and peer review. Jews not Arabs were there first maintaining a connection and continuous presence for 3500 years not Arabs.

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel Tell that to the rest of the world, who does not recognize East Jerusalem as the "united capital" of Israel, but rather occupied territory. Israel absolutely has a legal obligation under international law as the occupying power to insure the safety and well being of those under it's occupation. With regard to the Palestinian resources being exploited by Israel, just read the World Bank report on that. I wonder how you would "behave" in such situation?

[nopecharliesnoangel]

@steute2011

Wrong. Egypt massed approximately 100,000 of its 160,000 troops in the Sinai, including all of its seven divisions. Read UN Charter Article 51. International law makes a clear distinction between defensive wars and wars of aggression. All of Israel's wars with its Arab neighbors were in self-defense.

All Israeli citizens Jew & non-Jew are equal under the rule of law. That's no even a debatable fact. Arabs in the territories control their own people don't conflate the two.

[steute2011]

@nopecharliesnoangel It really doesn't matter who stated the war, even though it was Israel that struck first with the surprise attack on Egypt in 1967, which is illegal under international law. Preemptive war is only legal and defensive when authorized by the UNSC. As you might say...Read the Charter, don't guess! Also Israel does not grant Palestinians equal rights under the law in the West Bank...Quite the opposite.