Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

96 Mustang GT vs 07 V6 Mustang

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
88,387
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 26, 2008

stock 1996 Mustang GT vs 2007 V6 Mustang with magnaflow.

Myth of V6 Mustangs keeping up with V8 96-98 Mustangs debunked! V6 are slower turds!

For all the non- believers that this 96GT put down 208rwhp here is the dyno sheet.
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/4671/dscn0087ee9.jpg

www.salinasracing.com

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Shit you guys think these cars are slow? You guys should see my 1995 Ford Ranger, 2.3L's of pure slow, won't even do 60MPH up hill lol.

  • @Fizano55 Unless you're under 25, can't afford the insurance on a gt, worked your ass off to afford a new car and love the look of the 05-09's.

see all

All Comments (612)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Haha, buster motorsports!!

  • I love '96-98 GT Mustangs, but swap drivers and the '07 wins all day long.

  • Always wondered if my 2004 Mazda 6s (v6) could keep up with a mid-90's GT. Both are roughly the same HP (215 for the GT, 220 for the 6) and weight (3200 for the GT, 3300 for the 6). Although mine is an auto and probably has less torque. Hmm....

  • @Z28inNC Hell yeah there is not a driver in the world that can shift a manuel trans as fast as a automatic hands down.

  • @odessaboy Well I don't know who you race but Its pretty much a proven fact with equal drivers that the non pi mustangs are still faster than the 4.0. They make their power lower in the rpm have like 50ft/lbs more torque and weigh less. They also run better stock 1/4 mile times. And the 96's are much faster off the line with a decent driver. They make their torque very low in the powerband.

  • @NitroGadvRules I've only raced one 96, which had mods, that kept up with my old 2006 v6. Mine was an automatic, too. That means every single one that I raced, which was probably four or five, had to be crappy.

  • what is it with people bashing autos? Do those of you who "bash" auto's not realize that NHRA drag racers use autos?

  • @NitroGadvRules actually the Trans AM GTA(89, I think) was the fastest production car in America. But yeah, Fbodies where heavy as hell compared to a foxbody

  • @odessaboy crappy drivers, the non-pi 4.6 is still much faster than a 4.0l mustang. I have a 2001 mustang bullitt gt.

  • @Z28inNC the 80s fox bodies were faster stock that the 80's f-bodies. But yeah ls1 vs 4.6 is pretty bad. Still the 4.6's saving grace is that they like boost.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more