Beamship Variation V Nice Lift-Off!

The five-footer, in a rock steady hover. The three one-foot corners have been electrically isolated for pitch-and roll-control experiments! Work with these TT Brown devices is ongoing. The father of modern Ballistic rocketry, German Dr. Hermann Oberth, stated in the '50s that " UFOs are REAL, EXTRATERRESTRIAL, and fly by GRAVITY-CONTROL". We call this BARYCENTRIC-CONTROL, DYNAMIC COUNTERBARY, or THE KONTRABARIC EFFEKT (Burkhard Heim). This is only ONE of MANY methods of Gravity-Control.Google: GRAVITY RAND. The stars beckon. All you need is love, love is all you need...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• high
• voltage
• artificial
• gravity
• warp
• drive
• star
• trek
• levitation
• Beamship
• lifter
• Anti-gravity
• UFO
• Tesla
• electrogravitics
• force
• field
• electrogravity
• tt
• brown
• electrokinetic
• apparatus
• top
• secret
• disclosure
• project
• ftl
• stardrive
• interstellar
• travel
• green
• jobs
• clean
• energy
• propellantless
• propulsion
• biefeld

[Beamshipcaptain]

WB Scott, " Black World Engineers,Scientists Encourage Using Higly Classified Technology for Civil Applications," AVIATION WEEK AND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, (March 9,1992):66-67, "Northrop Studying Sonic Boom Remedy,"AVIATION WEEK and SPACE Tech., (January 22,1968):21, AG Obolensky, THE MAGNETIC FORCE IS FASTER THAN LIGHT, T. Garber, et.al., "Space Transportation Systems, Launch Systems and Propulsion for the Space Exploration Initiative: Results from Project OUTREACH'" RAND Report N-3283-AF/NASA,1991

[Hansolo60]

You were right about the electrostatics!

Coulomb's law is the same as the Newton's law of universal gravitation!! Both share the same properties. The G constant is N*m^2/kg^2 and the k constant is N*m^2/C^2!!! If we could replace the place of weigh with charge it'll be fantastic.

The first law represents an attractive force, the second law - attractive AND REPULSIVE!

This all proves to me the Law of the squares and the Searl Effect.

[dozerminer]

awsome !!! i think the next logical step in the lifter technology is to add it to a coanda effect uav .can it be done? jedi master !!!!!

[Beamshipcaptain]

@quidproquo2004 POSSIBILITY OF A SRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha, Yokohama, Japan, Iwanaga, N. 1999, "Review of some Field Propulsion Methods from the General Relativistic Standpoint," AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, 1051-1059, "TT Brown, "How I Control Gravitation," SCIENCE AND INVENTION, Aug. 1929, " Towards Flight Without Stress Strain or Weight", INTEL, Washington, DC, INTERAVIA, March 23, 1956, "How to 'fall' into Space, BUSINESS WEEK, Feb 8, 1958, p.51-53

[Beamshipcaptain]

@quidproquo2004 Einstein and Laub, ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, V.26, 1908, P.533 and p. 541, Graham and Lahoz, "Observation of Static Electromagnetic Angular Momentum in Vacuo," NATURE, V. 285, May 15, 1980, P.129, FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR, Thomas B. Bahder and Chris Fazi, US AORMY research Lab, Adelphi, MD, 2000, JW Campbell, (NASA), "Cylindrical asymmetrical capacitor devices for Space Applications", US Pat.. 6,775,123, issued on Aug.10,2004.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@quidproquo2004 There are NASA vdeos of this effect working in vacuum on YouTube. You have not looked! Saxyl, EJ, "An Electrically Charged Torque Pendulum," NATURE, July 11, 1964, Woodward, James F,"A New Experimental Approach to Mac's Principle and Relativistic Gravitation," FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V3, No.5,1990, p.497, Woodward, "Flux Capacitors and the Origin of Inertia", FOUND OF PHYSICS, V.34, 2004, p. 1475.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@quidproquo2004 Look at NASA's test of the concept in vacuum! Obviously, NASA LIES. Nothing new for NASA. We do not doubt we went to the moon, but we doubt that it was done all with Internal Combustion. It was the result of GERMAN extrapolations of Robert Goddard's pioneering work, and also Thomas Townsend Brown's work.

[quidproquo2004]

@Beamshipcaptain Can you please point me to one credible source? APS, Nature, something?  Where has NASA published results backing up your claim? According to NASA's website, their tests of the biefield brown effect were negative.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@quidproquo2004 THis works more efficiently without atmosphere. The question of vacuum function was settled over half a century ago, in various countries, labs and institutions, and more recently by NASA, Purdue University, Takaaki Musha, and a client of mine John Fiala, als confirmed vacuum function, and onboard power. Ion wind is too weak a force to cause levitation of even a 5-gram model by over 3 orders of magnitude. Do the math youself! And this model is over 35 grams in weight!

[quidproquo2004]

@Beamshipcaptain Why were they the only ones? Why not ten, twenty or thirty?

[quidproquo2004]

This has nothing to do with gravity. It only works in the presence of the atmosphere.

[sphinxofthenewage]

wonder if its possible for metallic molecules to change / react to enegry available in abundance in our atmostphere.