Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

WINvote Electronic Voting Machine Quality Assurance Tests? FAILED!

As a former Software Quality Assurance Tester, and current developer, I know how to test a software program. Out of curiosity, I decided to bang on the voting machine for a few minutes before actu...  
 
Customize

More From: onecuriousvoter

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
7 ratings
Sign in to rate
2,785 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (13)   Options

Loading...
flapjack9999 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
lol, did you bang on it like the Fonz would or Mike Tyson??
douro20 (5 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
iVoTronic machines are manufactured to military specifications for shock and dust resistance, as well as having three processors, each having its own memory channel, and a cryptographic coprocessor which has met with NSA approval.
onecuriousvoter (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Seriously though, did you actually watch the video? You're claim of "random touch points at other places on the screen" doesn't hold much water because, in fact, those "random" places were always the same places. How do you explain that one? I have to agree with "Feeceesmmm" (although, not necessarily with the name chosen) but, you "basically owned yourself." Before suggesting I should do some research...maybe you should start by actually paying attention to the video.
dbmoore (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Did watch the video. By "random," I meant both different spots on different screens, as well as the possibility that different spots will be activated on the same screen (less common). FWIW, you were almost certainly voting on a resistive touchscreen.

Feceseater pwned himself with his lame username, and his public display of dysfunction.
onecuriousvoter (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I wasn't going to respond to you, but since you're still on my thread, I will. You were actually correct. I DID have to tap it harder for it to "work better, dufus." I don't quite understand your comment "If you smack a touch screen of that size, it will activate random touch points at other places on the screen." How is the SIZE of the touchscreen relevant? And, are you sure it will "activate random touch points at other places on the screen?" I'm not following your logic on that one.
dbmoore (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Google "how touchscreens work." Hitting it harder produces fluctuations and flex. It will fail where the layers are weakly separated (and this will repeatedly activate one spot), or in random spots (depending on how you hit it and what types of flaws there are in the screen). The larger the screen, the more the flex (and the more likely there are defective or nearly defective zones). It's not a conspiracy, it's just the current state of technology.
onecuriousvoter (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
You are F O S.
Feeceesmmm (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Dude, while I sat here and thought of various retorts, i realized that the sheer stupidity of your comment doesn't even need a flame. You basically owned yourself. Gratz on looking like a tard. Teach us more, O guru of technology and conspiracy theories.

Oh BTW: OWNT
dbmoore (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Of all the various retorts you thought of, I'm so impressed with the one you chose to go with. Congratulations! You have really cut me to the quick! Your rapier wit and keen insight really put me in my place. I definitely have much to learn from you, O guru of excellent put-downs and critical thinking. Please, post another of your brilliant thoughts when you finish cleaning the second floor toilets.
Feeceesmmm (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
lol....maybe you should read my comment, where i clearly state that you owned yourself in your own post and no retort was necessary.

After cleaning the third floor toilets(took me a little longer then expected, sorry I couldn't get back to YOU after teh second floor), here's me brilliant post: kindly diaf fgt.
HUNGRY FORUM TROLL HUNGRY, or btw lrn2flame nublet before you hurt yourself with your pathetic attempts and shift-F7s in MS Word lol

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.