Fucking creationists, how do they work?

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=FI6Je6Xcamk

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• evolution
• creationism
• atheism
• Christianity
• biology
• science
• fucktard

[Mogley52]

SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

[blackacidlizzard]

@Mogley52

When you're even worse at philosophy than Richard Dawkins, when you make logical errors so blatant that even the average liberal arts major can spot them, it is impossible that you will have anything to contribute

[Cailwyn]

Good vid, iI guess, but this idea that people are stupid: stupid compared to what?

If we go with humanity is 'stupid', then there is no such thing as 'smart'. What is smarter than people? Is it some abstract human concept? Concept better than human concept?

Is humanity is smarter than humanity, or do you(people calling humanity dumb) think that you are smarter than humanity?

Just something that's been itching me.

[blackacidlizzard]

@Cailwyn

It is quite possibly because I am uncreative at the moment, but I can only think of two natural unstated points of comparison: a baseline aggregate measure, or oneself. As the comparison is TO the former, that only leaves the latter as the unstated contrast.

Sectors of humanity are smarter than the average human. I honestly thought this was such an obvious truth that it never needed to be stated, but that was before I paid attention to arguments about race.

[danielvincentkelley]

No birds with gills argument is easily argued to futility. The answer is, birds have feet, people have feet. Reptiles have 4 limbs mammals have 4 limbs. Humans have tail bones, other animals have tail bones. There are salamanders with gills. Species don't change often, but we have witnessed it in the fossil record, Ambulocetus to Whale. Fish to Amphibians is another special change observed in the fossil record. Species change is mostly caused by an extreme change in the environment.

[blackacidlizzard]

Well, just as with the fish to frog evolution, this suggestion by the dipshit betrays a basic lack of knowledge of evolutionary theory.

What is indicated by the fossil record is that birds evolved from dinosaurs. Dinosaurs were not amphibious.

It's just another crocoduck - the branches known do not even slightly coincide with the random babbling this fuck spews.

And, as intercourseman pointed out, if there was a gilled bird, dipshit WOULD consider that animal "complete"

[InvincibleNumanist]

@Mogley52

"EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. "

lol... this ive gotta hear.

[Mogley52]

ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

[Mogley52]

EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator

[Mogley52]

NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

[Mogley52]

ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

[Mogley52]

IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

[Mogley52]

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

[Mogley52]

EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?