unlimited energy source
Uploader Comments (truthiseverall)
All Comments (110)
-
Look up cartesian pump .
-
E.L.S.A is the same as it uses water gravity and a Shuttle . It is owned by the inventor however it has the problem of overcomming gravity also .
-
Sorry.i am a free energy inventor an this was already tried 15 years ago with a device called . E.L.S.A .Same principle and i have the exclusive plans . Still it don't work
-
Keep those Gears turning !! First what you are saying is it runs off of gravity . It will NOT work in Space ,no gravity as it will just float away.Second it won't work underwater cause it runs with water so that nulls out also your 2 pounds of downward force will require 20 or more pound of force to over come gravity so it will drop once and never come back up unless you use your hands:
-
And when you said, this can be used in space... how is the water meant to fall down with no gravity..?
-
& what price point is this targeted at?
-
How many kw per hr. could this sustain in the configuration displayed?
-
I can appreciate your efforts on this. The missing piece of the puzzle is WHAT pushes and pulls on your 'accordion' - you need an energy source. In your description you speak of wave energy on the surface of the sea... that would be one possible source, if you have an ocean handy. Me, I'm in Arkansas so...
-
You have too many mechanical losses in your conversion train. And, sorry to say, it's already been thought of. :) Have a look at this:
enDOTwikipediaDOTorg/wiki/Isla
y_LIMPET It uses a column of air to drive an enclosed turbine.
-
Just the logic of it, what unkown force opens up your accordian? Explain yourself. The liquid runs into the accordian, as you say 2lbs of liquid to push the 15lbs accordian open so It can squeeze the 2lbs worth of liquid back into the container that would go down and repeat the cycle. The math is not correct, so explain yourself if you will, or remain a poor inventor as is.
Sorry, but the physics behind your "invention" is just garbage. This is more along the lines of crackpot science.
If you want to really know why this will not work, I suggest you go to school and learn.
Or you can finish building your invention and see the proof for yourself.
Gunner3210 5 months ago
@Gunner3210 Your imagination lacks as many parts as my parts of being able to explain it properly !
Throw it in the ocean, on a platform then, and crank it with the motion of a jailed boat.
Dont worry about it, XX Throw a flat rectangle on top of a bunch of triables, cut a piece off of the bottom, add dimention, to me means, it ends up looking a lot like the haul of a ship. PS. I do not yet suffer of dimentia. Welcome back. Good luck ! XX < overkill.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
The way you explain it it's easy to build, why don't you do it yourself?
deliquenme 6 months ago
@deliquenme I ran out of materials and thereafter, noticed that there was too many ways of harvesting energy, with the movement of liquid, air ... I saw my competion ! also There was other inventions for me to play with and, it became way to much for me to want to do, without you and others. This is too big for me. I am just offering the beginings now, my 1%. like an upsidedown corner stone to something ! XX read again. I am getting a little better at explaining my thoughts, corner stone brain.
truthiseverall 1 month ago