Keen Cambridge Lecture 2011 plus questions

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,491
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 25, 2011

This longer video includes the same topics as my other Cambridge lecture (description reproduced below) plus the Q&A session with the audience. The lecture covers the failure of neoclassical macroeconomics to foresee the crisis (and the attempt by neoclassicals to avoid the consequences of this failure), the key reason why they are wrong about its persistence (the endogeneity of money), Minsky's "Financial Instability Hypothesis", my initial models of that Hypothesis, the development of a method to produce strictly monetary models of capitalism, and an overview of my multi-sectoral monetary model of production.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ProfSteveKeen)

  • Feasible to some extent, since the level now is artificially low.

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Productive lending to main street and manufacturing industry should have happened, not ponzi lending focussed on making quick bucks in an asset price bubble.

  • Suppose the Ponzi lending of the last years had not occurred? Since it had a spin-off into ordinary spending and employment, what would employment levels have been without it?

    Do we need Ponzi lending to maintain employment at a reasonable level?

  • Yew

  • Would it make sense to have a semi-jubilee, where 50% of debts were forgiven, but then interest rates were doubled? This would preserve cash flows while halving the debt-income ratio.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more