2011 Canadian Federal Election English Debate Part 1 of 13

2011 Canadian Federal Election English Debate Part 1 of 13

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 2011
• Canadian
• Federal
• Election
• English
• Debate
• Ignatieff
• Harper
• Layton
• government
• finance
• politics
• economic
• economy
• environment
• educational
• commentary
• speech
• canada
• news
• defence

[motdcks]

i need transcript of this debate..please!

is anyone able to help me?

i really need the transcript for my last exam work.

sent it to me, probably i sent you somethings

[dmathews2010]

@motdcks .globalnews.ca/decisioncanada/­debate/index.html Pretty cool. Full video there and you can cut and paste the transcript out on the right.  Cheers, DM

[dmathews2010]

May 2, 2011: Comments now will be only approved and re-opened after the blackout on voting today.... DM

[dmathews2010]

No "editing" whatsoever. Youtube has time limits. Had to seperate the debate into chunks close to the 10min limit as possible at appropriate breaks. Was a fair and equal as possible even with the avatars for each video.

[donmont10]

no elizabeth may? D:

[Militantoh9]

Proportional isn't very good as it traditionally works. The parties appoint their MPs based on a heirachy of authority, probably based on ass kissing and the voter wont be able to kick corrupt people out of their seats.

[ultradumbass]

@Jaymz5555 so in the end it shows that left and right has absolutely nothing to do with the personality or your "views" it is more about how much resources the party would make. most youngsters and those inexperienced with how the political system works might get confused based on CBC saying anyone who takes right wing is a religious fanatic or racist to encourage people to vote for left wingers. PS: interestingly the system furthest to the right is fascism as it produces more than any other.

[ultradumbass]

@Jaymz5555 after 5 years all were summoned back to his court. those who had produced more than what they started with 5 years earlier were considered to the right. those that ended up producing less were considered to the left. right before the revolution mist that wanted "socialist change" were to the left and those that wanted a more competitive drive went to the right. the one who produced the most was seated to the far right and the one that made the least was seated to the far left.

[ultradumbass]

@Jaymz5555 the idea of left and right first started when king louis 16 gave over 100 communities a certain budget. 100 economists got absolute power over that village provided it didn't go against the constitution or treason. some were more firm on laws, others focused on technology and helping businesses thrive while others believed in massing a great egalitarian system. and for the next 5 years the economists were suppose to mark their improvements and resources produced.

[ultradumbass]

@Jaymz5555 and do you have a statistic or reference to back that up or is that just what you want to hear? spending has nothing to do with putting people into debt. it is called left and right for a reason you know, liberals think left means caring and right means religious. i am about to tell you the truth about what left and right really means on the next post as i am running out of space., fucking stupid 500 character limit, they should at least add 1,000.

[Jaymz5555]

@ultradumbass

How do you figure? The conservatives have given us the largest deficit in history. They're spending way more then liberals ever did!!