A Case For Libertarian Immigration Control (US) PART 2
Uploader Comments (IndividualAutonomy)
Top Comments
-
This is one of the best political videos on youtube. FANTASTIC!
Video Responses
All Comments (29)
-
mexico is genetically 60-70% non-indigenous. hilarious.
its too bad ron paul wont clarify his thoughts on cultural issues. he never owned up to those newsletters..
-
I never watched this part! FAIL ON MY PART!
-
Thing is, the IDEAS are created in large part by AMERICAN academics in the social sciences and humanities on the left.
-
The way I see it, the state's ONLY true function, is the protection of its citizenry. This of course must include its borders, only a moron would think otherwise. I am, and have been my entire adult life, a libertarian. Libertarian policy must include a stringent border policy against invasion. I have absolutely no problem with immigration, as long as it's done legally, and does not overcome the ability of the state to survive.
-
@kubaniski "isn't a large portion of the latin american population predominantly European"
The Mexicans coming into the US have high levels of negro admixture.
-
I am a little suspicious about your choice of news reports and I'm going to check the crime rates because blacks are incarcerated FAR MORE than hispanics and whites combined... but otherwise I do agree with the controls.
-
@NAARandom my point was that it's not likely to affect me. and i'm not sure that the situation between blacks and latinos is analogous to cats and dogs, hopefully there is a way out of it, if not then i guess i'll have no choice but to join the white man's struggle against latino voter oppression lol
-
@IndividualAutonomy i just watched the video again and noticed that you claim to have addressed the question of how immigation is related tio more statism in the first video, so forget my last comment i'll see if i have anything to say after checking that one out.
Restore the freedom of association that was abolished under the civil rights act, and most of the issues go away.
billyjoeallen 1 year ago
@billyjoeallen
Is that addressed to me and this video? It surely doesn't answer or solve anything I have brought up in Part 1 and Part 2.
IndividualAutonomy 1 year ago
Will any of the videos adress spiritual compunctions? Look man, I don't believe certain acts are objectively bad or anything, but that doesn't mean I go around murdering. And I do not feel comfortable with the idea of threatening someone with murder just because they crossed some imaginary line defined by massive blurry corporations acting in the name of mythologies such as "the public good" (And yes, I know priv. prop. are also imaginary lines), and I suspect I am not alone.
TotalAnomy 1 year ago
@TotalAnomy
Well any major position change takes time to contemplate. You are welcome to come to Skype if you wish. The only thing I would say is that there are sadly numerous libertarians that would sacrifice a greater level of libertarianism as well as their own lives (or so they proclaim) at the altar of "libertarian means" like a religious fanatic. Maybe it is because they are afraid of being called a racist and can still use libertarian dogma.
IndividualAutonomy 1 year ago
Your argument sounds more convincing every time. I've learned to put aside my knee-jerk reactions of calling people racist and I can definitely see it from your perspective.
However, I'm still on the fence. Plus, I don't feel comfortable palling around with Republicans. But maybe I can get over it.
BloodiCheeseCake 1 year ago 6
@BloodiCheeseCake
lol
IndividualAutonomy 1 year ago