Jackson5 -Corner Of The Sky- 1972
Top Comments
All Comments (60)
-
@JazzMaestra i agree
-
all the criticism these boys ever got aside......THESE BOYS WERE BAD!
-
Not black, not old, still loving it!
-
@MuziekFan1995 , You don't make any sense. I was talking about Auto-Tune, not personality and looks
-
@SpazChat Well, they are more funny, more handsome, more cute then the Jackson 5.
-
@MuziekFan1995 , I find it interesting how you don't explain yourself. I think of Big Time Rush that way, because they ARE!
-
@SpazChat Yes, well, that's how I think about the Jackson 5. I'm sorry, but it's the truth.
-
@MuziekFan1995 , Big Time Rush are synthetic and auto-tuned... Yuck.
-
@dancemachine1919 , I always thought he was better with his brothers also, mainly because his voice was better. They also had good chemistry together on stage...I remember this era distinctly
I'm young and I remember. Young listeners are rare but we're out there. :-) While I love MJ's solo stuff, i agree that he was best with the Jackson 5.
dancemachine1919 2 years ago 19
Michael was at his best with his brothers. It is so sad that his synergy with the rest of his siblings (particularly Jermaine) has been so overlooked by younger audiences. But those of us who are black and over 40 years of age remember a much more cohesive group!! RIP. Sorry, but as great as THRILLER was, it does not even register with those of us who remember Michael Jackson's earlier years.
JazzMaestra 2 years ago 18