The New Science And The Final Theory: Cosmogenesis Part 1
Uploader Comments (ISOMysterEy)
Video Responses
All Comments (20)
-
I am reading that book now I started to read it several years ago but had all these other physics books to read , so put it on the back burner.
He is a innovative thinker and I like that, I am not a big fan of consensus science because it is controlled and manipulated. However, I do like the electric universe hypothesis, and question whether the Universe is really expanding at all.
Halton Arp the astronomer claims there is a problem with red shift, kind of throws a big spanner in the works.
-
i would listen to you but that continually running water...
McCutcheon has an impeccable hold on the logical inconsistencies,assumptions and dogma that underpin current scientific thinking.
-
@ISOMysterEy- thanks for replying, im not sure i understand it though :) I got 2 E's in science at school! @mikeybrumbrum- i hear ya and understand, but think that humans just dont love all humans- clearly, otherwise there would be no such deprivation. I for one would gladly pay an extra tax, if it was global, regulated properly and fairly distributed among the needy- to me that just makes good sense huh? shame not enough people across the world would agree- 2them charity starts at home i guess?
-
There is a wrong and a divine judgement judgement. You are fighting a straw dog argument, thus wasting your time. Stupid = Closed minded. That would fit you. Closed minded. End of story. I win, you lose. Right and wrong on display. Show some respect you creep.
Can somebody answer if this is a flaw in the expanding atoms theory: If a coffin is buried in the ground, and all atoms expand from their centers, then the coffin is going to inevitably be crushed. This in my mind is due to spatial occupancy. The atoms that occupy the same space are going to expanding into one another- this for an object surrounded would apply more and more force would it not? Hope someone can explain if i sound mad? Cheers! Peace
CANNIBoy 2 years ago
Well the atoms themselves cannot be crushed, and the object can only be crushed if there is sufficent external pressure. The expanding atoms in a coffin would be exerting an internal pressure in the coffin contually holding it together. The expanding atoms in the ground around and in the whole planet create the pressure of what we call gravity and pressure on the coffin. The amount of force is coorelated to the expansion rate which is what the "4 forces" of nature are derived from.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
So all the expansion forces are already accounted for through gravity and the expansion of the dirt and coffin themselves. The atomic forces holding together the molecules and atoms of the coffin are created by the same expansion pressure you mention according to Mark's ideas. In other words the force is already accounted for in the natural world we observe. If you buried a coffin sufficently deep these same forces of expansion on a planetary level are responsible for crushing it.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
That's the best short term explanation I can come up with for now.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
It doesn't really matter, any of it - not unless you can PROVE it.
You could argue equally as hard, for "constant contraction". The universe "could" just as easilly be contracting, as expanding, and there are conflicting theories.
I would be more tempted to concentrate on the world around us, now, and sorting out its problems, before getting led too far off into talk about "expanding universe theories".
Its amaxing to wonder about these things, but not make work of them, people starve.
mikeybrumbrum 2 years ago
You can't prove anything to someone who won't listen.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago