See if we can achieve the promised download/upload speeds from both these major carriers in Baltimore's Camden Yards. Note: The goal is to test what the average consumer would get in a given location, not necessarily to compare the two.
They are both good. Ma boy has the t bolt and I the EVO. I got 9.2 mbps and he got 47 mbps down using ookla once in LA. Got on YouTube and I kept whooping his ass left and right! We decided it was a glitch for the t bolt on ookla.
I get around 15 MBS down and 1.90 upload in NY
TheLoops1990 1 hour ago
Rcr wireless with a wired mic
iamthebesfromyou 2 months ago
Should've done more than one test and maybe loaded a web page to be more accurate
gx1000100 3 months ago
They are both good. Ma boy has the t bolt and I the EVO. I got 9.2 mbps and he got 47 mbps down using ookla once in LA. Got on YouTube and I kept whooping his ass left and right! We decided it was a glitch for the t bolt on ookla.
orod1016 4 months ago
@andreptile17 Cause its cheaper. You get what you paid for. Verizon costs more but you get more coverage.
YCCA9K 5 months ago
ran my speedtest app on my thunderbolt here in NYC i got (43.10mbps down / 9.40mbps up / 57pin)
CamaroWarrior 5 months ago
@wpgeek the sprint 4g network has more subscribers, VZW ended the 2nd Quarter with 1.2million. While Sprint has 4million+
andreptile17 5 months ago
45mbps down and 13mbps up on my Thunderbolt WI / IL
ryanmajor2 5 months ago
The Sprint network is less saturated than Verizon. VZW benefits indoors+rural areas (700Mhz better penetration). Sprint has a capacity advantage.
wpgeek 5 months ago