Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Thirty Republicans

http://senate.gov/legislati... In 2009, the Senate voted to not fund companies which force their employees to forfeit their rights to sue for sexual assault or harassment. Thirty Senators voted a...  
 
Customize

More From: syndalis

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
606 ratings
Sign in to rate
39,168 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (358)   Options

Loading...
masterbuilder2009 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Interesting thing is that many of these senators have daughters.

I doubt they would be so complacent if their daughter was gang-raped and locked in a box.
TerryEFV2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Shame.
Just shame.
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Yes, I agree. It's really a shame that liberals are so underhanded, so desperate, so shallow, that they attempt to take a bill that has no bearing no rape, doesn't affect rape legslation, doesn't aid any rape victim into a rape bill.

Then attempt to smear a party by saying those who voted against it as 'pro-rape'.

Shameful.
Just shameful.
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Phillip phillip,

Here's something else you haven't thought of, which again provides proof to the pointlessness of this amendment.

It's an amendment to the Defense Appropriations Act of 2010.

Which means ..........................

That it will only affect defense funding for the FY2010. It won't carry over to 2011, 2012, etc. So once again, utterly and completely pointless.
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Lets see....

GovTrack, Library of Congress, Huffington Post, NY Times, Washington Post, Whitehouse, GoP, Democrats, DoD ...

If you go to each of those websites, you'll see that they say the same thing. Bill passed the Senate on Oct 6th.

Now, Huffington Post, NY Times, Washington Post, and several others have articles on how Obama doesn't want this amendment.

So basically, phillip, instead of living in your dream world, try paying attention to facts.
phillipmarch22 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You are so cute! You also have a tendency to change the subject when you are up against the wall.

I was born in 1959, I am 50 years old. I retired at 40. The President can set aside the DOD's opinion and sign the bill.. I am sure he has already disagreed with the DOD.
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Change the subject? The only subject changing I do is from your fantasy to real life fact.

You need to wake up son. Plus, I already know how old you are, you can quit lying, punk.
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"President Obama isn't, it's the DoD!". Ummm, moron. You are aware that the President is the Head of the DoD. The DoD doesn't officially go against a will without at least the President's Knowledge and usually at the President's order.

So that makes two possible scenarios. 1.) Prez knows about it, but hasn't told the DoD to stand down. or 2.) Prez ordered the DoD to oppose the amendment.

Either way, the Prez is involved and has made it quite clear his intentions.
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That proves it.

Not only do you not know how to read (with any significant level of comprehention), you apparently don't know how to tell the time and date either. Hahahahaha.

BTW. Defense Appropriation Bill of 2010 H.R. 3326. I don't know what bill you think passed yesterday, but it wasn't this one. H.R. 3326 passed the Senate 10/6/09
mcdonalsuny (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yesterday? Are you a fucking idiot? Lets see ... I just posted the dates that it passed below.

50 year old. Funny, just the other day you said you were 45. A few days before that, you said you were 40.

What? Do you age 5 years a week??

You are the biggest fucking pathalogical liar I've ever encountered.

P.S. The Defense Appropriation Bill of 2010 passed the Senate Oct 6. Yesterday was Nov 6. So, not only to age 5 years in a week, you think a month is a day.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.