Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Theory Of Everything - On The Theory Of Relativity

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,287
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jun 10, 2007

The Theory of Relativity.

If you would like to discuss any of my videos please join me on my new theory of everything (TOE) forums:

http://www.protheory.com (My Website)

http://www.fprotheory.com (My New Forum)


Please don't think me arrogant, I'm just a normal thinker that had an idea one day which turned into Positive Reacting Opposites (Pro Theory).

Please check out my channel and my website if you'd like to get a broader view of me and what I think. I'm a positive and friendly person but at the same time I've got to get some closure on this idea and this is my dilemma. I'm hoping that these videos will help me to explain.

I know it probably seems like a ridiculous idea at first glance, saying three things simultaneously, but when you look deeper into things you will see that it's not quite as ridiculous as it seems. My new forum is a mirror of my website open for complete discussion. YouTube comments and messages don't quite do as good a job as a proper discussion forum. I look forward to hearing from you :)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (protheory)

  • I'll take that one as a compliment I think lol

  • I just got your reply, thanks for that, I appreciate it. Would you mind if either I post your message as a comment or you do please? I made this video to try and explain Pro theory not really to explain every intricacy of Relativity but all the same if something I've said needs correcting I'd like others to know as well.

  • MaceWright, thanks for your comment. I'm not so sure I'm into anything constant and unchanging but I'll have a think about your comments here. My main problem with the speed of light in a vacuum is that it's classically assumed to be unchanging I suppose.

  • JAL173, I've messaged you a couple of weeks ago to ask you for details of where I'm way off on my understanding but you've not yet replied to me. Just so everybody knows I take all comments at face value :)

  • I'm not really interested in the technicalities of Relativity I'm more interested in my theory of everything. Thanks for your comment though.

  • Quite right, light is a changing entity therefore it shouldn't be viewed as a constant. Light in a vacuum is the constant in this context but I'm not so sure it's unchanging.

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • vin was first a bad actor now a bad scientist lol

  • You really don't have much of a clue about what relativity or indeed e=mc^2 means. E=MC^2 highlights the equivalence and interchangeability of energy and matter. Relativity is a way of understanding our universe that describes the interaction between space, time, energy and matter on a non quantum level.

    I suggest you apply your ideas to the concepts of different infinity sets, see Cantor and Hilbert

  • 1. It is not necessary to construct Special Relativity on the assumption that the speed of light is invariant, although historically this is how it has been done.

    2. The observed retardation of the speed of light in the presence of masses by a far-observer is accounted for in General Relativity by the strong equivalence principle. ALL observations to date agree ENTIRELY with General Relativity. The speed of light in the vicinity of mass is invariant, but in a warped spacetime metric.

  • 3.

    This enormeously rapid movement takes perhaps in a moment all the energy of the

    visible universe away from that space where it locates at the moment.

    4.

    Because of this movement this space does not need to expand and this points out that

    the so called "Big Bang" theory is a wrong theory. All the things can be explained

    three-dimentionally. All the substance has been born during the movement.

    search youtube video

    Idea from Kuopio

  • look, its vin diesel, hahaha

  • I just replied.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more